• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Global Health with Justice: Controlling the Floodgates of the Upstream Determinants of Health through Evidence-Based Law.全球健康与正义:通过循证法律控制健康上游决定因素的闸门
Public Health Ethics. 2020 May 8;13(1):4-9. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaa011. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Legal Determinants of Health.健康的法律决定因素。
Med Law Rev. 2022 Dec 8;30(4):610-634. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwac025.
3
Advancing Action on Health Equity Through a Sociolegal Model of Health.通过健康的社会法律模式推进卫生公平行动。
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):904-927. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12539. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
4
Law's power to safeguard global health: a Lancet-O'Neill Institute, Georgetown University Commission on Global Health and the Law.法律保障全球健康的力量:《柳叶刀》-乔治敦大学奥尼尔全球健康与法律研究所委员会
Lancet. 2015 Apr 25;385(9978):1603-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60756-5. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
5
'Harnessing the power of the law': a qualitative analysis of the legal determinants of health in English urban planning and recommendations for fairer and healthier decision-making.“利用法律的力量”:对英国城市规划中健康决定因素的法律定性分析及对更公平、更健康决策的建议。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Feb 11;23(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15166-0.
6
Using experiential learning to develop interprofessional skills in global health: perspectives from the O'NeillInstitute for National and Global Health Law.
J Law Med Ethics. 2014 Dec;42 Suppl 2:65-8. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12190.
7
Law, Global Health, and Sustainable Development: The Lancet Commission on the Legal Determinants of Health.法律、全球健康与可持续发展:《柳叶刀》健康问题法律决定因素委员会
J Law Med. 2020 Apr;27(3):505-512.
8
Legal, Moral and Political Determinants within the Social Determinants of Health: Approaching Transdisciplinary Challenges through Intradisciplinary Reflection.健康的社会决定因素中的法律、道德和政治决定因素:通过学科内反思应对跨学科挑战。
Public Health Ethics. 2020 May 3;13(1):41-47. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaa009. eCollection 2020 Apr.
9
Global health governance: commission on social determinants of health and the imperative for change.全球卫生治理:社会决定因素健康问题委员会与变革势在必行。
J Law Med Ethics. 2010 Fall;38(3):470-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00506.x.
10
Introduction: Ten Years of Global Health Law.引言:全球卫生法十年
J Law Med Ethics. 2025;53(S1):2-4. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.20. Epub 2025 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Lord Sumption and the values of life, liberty and security: before and since the COVID-19 outbreak.萨姆普特勋爵与生命、自由和安全的价值观:新冠疫情爆发之前与之后
J Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 12;48(10):779-84. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107332.

本文引用的文献

1
Legal, Moral and Political Determinants within the Social Determinants of Health: Approaching Transdisciplinary Challenges through Intradisciplinary Reflection.健康的社会决定因素中的法律、道德和政治决定因素:通过学科内反思应对跨学科挑战。
Public Health Ethics. 2020 May 3;13(1):41-47. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaa009. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
The legal determinants of health: harnessing the power of law for global health and sustainable development.健康的法律决定因素:利用法律力量促进全球健康与可持续发展。
Lancet. 2019 May 4;393(10183):1857-1910. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30233-8. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
3
Revisiting the Corporate and Commercial Determinants of Health.重新审视健康的企业和商业决定因素。
Am J Public Health. 2018 Sep;108(9):1167-1170. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304510. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
4
Policy, politics and public health.政策、政治与公共卫生。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Oct 1;27(suppl_4):40-43. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx152.
5
A Transdisciplinary Approach to Public Health Law: The Emerging Practice of Legal Epidemiology.公共卫生法的跨学科方法:法律流行病学的新兴实践
Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:135-48. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021841. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
6
Beyond policy analysis: the raw politics behind opposition to healthy public policy.超越政策分析:反对健康公共政策背后的原生政治
Health Promot Int. 2015 Jun;30(2):380-96. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau044. Epub 2014 May 28.
7
For debate: a new wave in public health improvement.争议:公共卫生改善的新浪潮。
Lancet. 2014 Nov 22;384(9957):1889-1895. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62341-7. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
8
The political origins of health inequity: prospects for change.健康不平等的政治根源:变革的前景。
Lancet. 2014 Feb 15;383(9917):630-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62407-1. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
9
Public health ethics: from foundations and frameworks to justice and global public health.公共卫生伦理学:从基础与框架到正义与全球公共卫生
J Law Med Ethics. 2004 Summer;32(2):232-42, 190. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00470.x.
10
Strategy of prevention: lessons from cardiovascular disease.预防策略:心血管疾病的经验教训。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Jun 6;282(6279):1847-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6279.1847.

全球健康与正义:通过循证法律控制健康上游决定因素的闸门

Global Health with Justice: Controlling the Floodgates of the Upstream Determinants of Health through Evidence-Based Law.

作者信息

Coggon John, Gostin Lawrence O

机构信息

O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown Law, McDonough Hall, Washington, DC 20001, USA. Email:

出版信息

Public Health Ethics. 2020 May 8;13(1):4-9. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaa011. eCollection 2020 Apr.

DOI:10.1093/phe/phaa011
PMID:32765646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7392640/
Abstract

This article introduces a special issue on the legal determinants of health, following the publication of the -O'Neill Institute of Georgetown University Commission's report on the subject. We contextualize legal determinants as a significant and vital aspect of the social determinants of health, explain the work of the -O'Neill Commission and outline where consequent research will usefully be directed. We also introduce the papers that follow in the special issue, which together set out in greater detail the work of the Commission and critically engage with different aspects of the report and the application of its findings and recommendations.

摘要

在乔治敦大学奥尼尔研究所委员会发布关于健康的法律决定因素的报告之后,本文介绍了一期关于该主题的特刊。我们将法律决定因素视为健康的社会决定因素的一个重要且关键的方面,阐述了奥尼尔委员会的工作,并概述了后续研究的有益方向。我们还介绍了特刊中随后的论文,这些论文共同更详细地阐述了委员会的工作,并对报告的不同方面以及其研究结果和建议的应用进行了批判性探讨。