Sogkas Georgios, Hirsch Stefanie, Olsson Karen Maria, Hinrichs Jan B, Thiele Thea, Seeliger Tabea, Skripuletz Thomas, Schmidt Reinhold Ernst, Witte Torsten, Jablonka Alexandra, Ernst Diana
Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Medical School Hannover, Hanover, Germany.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jul 16;7:332. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00332. eCollection 2020.
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) represents a frequent extra-glandular manifestation of primary Sjögren's Syndrome (pSS). Limited published data regarding phenotyping and treatment exists. Advances in managing specific ILD phenotypes have not been comprehensively explored in patients with coexisting pSS. This retrospective study aimed to phenotype lung diseases occurring in a well-described pSS-ILD cohort and describe treatment course and outcomes. Between April 2018 and February 2020, all pSS patients attending our Outpatient clinic were screened for possible lung involvement. Clinical, laboratory and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings were analyzed. Patients were classified according to HRCT findings into five groups: usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), desquamative interstitial pneumonia (DIP), combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE), and non-specific-ILD. Lung involvement was confirmed in 31/268 pSS patients (13%). One-third (10/31) of pSS-ILD patients were Ro/SSA antibody negative. ILD at pSS diagnosis was present in 19/31 (61%) patients. The commonest phenotype was UIP = 13 (43%), followed by NSIP = 9 (29%), DIP = 2 (6 %), CPFE = 2 (6 %), and non-specific-ILD = 5 (16%). Forced vital capacity (FVC) and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (D) appeared lower in UIP and DIP, without reaching a significant difference. Treatment focused universally on intensified immunosuppression, with 13/31 patients (42%) receiving cyclophosphamide. No anti-fibrotic treatments were used. Median follow-up was 38.2 [12.4-119.6] months. Lung involvement in pSS is heterogeneous. Better phenotyping and tailored treatment may improve outcomes and requires further evaluation in larger prospective studies.
间质性肺疾病(ILD)是原发性干燥综合征(pSS)常见的腺体外表现。关于其表型分析和治疗的已发表数据有限。对于合并pSS的患者,特定ILD表型管理方面的进展尚未得到全面探索。这项回顾性研究旨在对一个详细描述的pSS-ILD队列中出现的肺部疾病进行表型分析,并描述治疗过程和结果。在2018年4月至2020年2月期间,对在我们门诊就诊的所有pSS患者进行了肺部受累可能性的筛查。分析了临床、实验室和高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)结果。根据HRCT结果将患者分为五组:寻常型间质性肺炎(UIP)、非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP)、脱屑性间质性肺炎(DIP)、合并肺纤维化和肺气肿(CPFE)以及非特异性ILD。在268例pSS患者中有31例(13%)确诊有肺部受累。三分之一(10/31)的pSS-ILD患者Ro/SSA抗体呈阴性。19/31(61%)的患者在pSS诊断时即存在ILD。最常见的表型是UIP = 13例(43%),其次是NSIP = 9例(29%),DIP = 2例(6%),CPFE = 2例(6%),非特异性ILD = 5例(16%)。UIP和DIP患者的用力肺活量(FVC)和一氧化碳弥散量(D)似乎较低,但未达到显著差异。治疗普遍集中在强化免疫抑制上,13/31例患者(42%)接受了环磷酰胺治疗。未使用抗纤维化治疗。中位随访时间为[12.4 - 119.6]个月,38.2个月。pSS中的肺部受累情况是异质性的。更好的表型分析和针对性治疗可能会改善预后,需要在更大规模的前瞻性研究中进一步评估。