Engelke Fiona, Budde Petra, De Vita Salvatore, Dörner Thomas, Ernst Diana, Gras Jan, Heidecke Harald, Kilian Annika Loredana, Kniesch Katja, Lindemann Ann-Sophie, Quartuccio Luca, Ritter Jacob, Schulze-Forster Kai, Seeliger Benjamin, Zucht Hans-Dieter, Witte Torsten
Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
Oncimmune Germany GmbH, Dortmund, Germany.
Front Immunol. 2025 Feb 3;16:1524940. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1524940. eCollection 2025.
The diagnosis of Sjögren's disease (SjD) in patients without autoantibodies against Ro/SSA is a major challenge. We aimed to identify novel autoantibodies in SjD that may facilitate the diagnostic procedure for Ro/SSA negative SjD.
IgG and IgA autoantibody reactivity of 94 potential candidate autoantigens for SjD, selected from a discovery screen of 1,629 human antigens coupled to Luminex beads and prior knowledge about potential biological relevance, were examined in serum of SjD patients (n=347) using Luminex and ELISA technology. Healthy (HC, n=118) and non-Sjögren's sicca syndrome (NSS, n=44) individuals served as controls. To assess disease specificity, the novel autoantibodies were also measured in serum of patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA, n=50), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE, n=49), and Systemic Sclerosis (SSc, n=37).
45 novel autoantibodies were significantly (p ≤ 0.05) more prevalent in SjD than in HC and were detected in up to 19% of the SjD cohort. The most common autoantibodies were against CCL4, M5, TMPO and OAS3. Some of the novel autoantibodies were associated with extraglandular disease manifestations, such as anti-TONSL or anti-IL6 with pulmonary involvement. We have developed a three and five marker panel for the detection of Ro/SSA negative patients, consisting of anti-FNBP4, anti-SNRPC, anti-CCL4, anti-M3 and anti-KDM6B, which had a sensitivity of up to 46% with a specificity of 95% (SjD vs. HC). Both panels discriminate these patients from HC, whereas the three-marker more effectively differentiates between Ro/SSA negative patients and NSS.
Novel autoantibodies will facilitate the diagnosis of Ro/SSA negative patients with SjD, in particular our predictive panel will be useful in the diagnosis and differentiation of these patients from healthy and NSS individuals in a clinical context. In addition, the autoantibodies may also be useful for risk stratification of extraglandular manifestations.
对于无抗Ro/SSA自身抗体的患者,干燥综合征(SjD)的诊断是一项重大挑战。我们旨在鉴定SjD中的新型自身抗体,这可能有助于Ro/SSA阴性SjD的诊断程序。
从1629种与人Luminex磁珠偶联的人类抗原的发现筛选以及关于潜在生物学相关性的先验知识中选择94种SjD潜在候选自身抗原,使用Luminex和ELISA技术检测SjD患者(n = 347)血清中的IgG和IgA自身抗体反应性。健康个体(HC,n = 118)和非干燥综合征(NSS,n = 44)个体作为对照。为评估疾病特异性,还在类风湿性关节炎(RA,n = 50)、系统性红斑狼疮(SLE,n = 49)和系统性硬化症(SSc,n = 37)患者的血清中检测新型自身抗体。
45种新型自身抗体在SjD中的流行率显著高于HC(p≤0.05),在高达19%的SjD队列中被检测到。最常见的自身抗体是针对CCL4、M5、TMPO和OAS3的。一些新型自身抗体与腺外疾病表现相关,如抗TONSL或抗IL6与肺部受累有关。我们开发了一个用于检测Ro/SSA阴性患者的三标记和五标记组合,由抗FNBP4、抗SNRPC、抗CCL4、抗M3和抗KDM6B组成,其敏感性高达46%,特异性为95%(SjD与HC相比)。两个组合均能将这些患者与HC区分开来,而三标记组合能更有效地将Ro/SSA阴性患者与NSS区分开来。
新型自身抗体将有助于Ro/SSA阴性SjD患者的诊断,特别是我们的预测组合在临床环境中对于这些患者与健康个体和NSS个体的诊断及鉴别诊断将很有用。此外,这些自身抗体也可能有助于腺外表现的风险分层。