Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China.
Stat Med. 2020 Nov 20;39(26):3879-3895. doi: 10.1002/sim.8699. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
Restricted mean survival time (RMST) evaluates the mean event-free survival time up to a prespecified time point. It has been used as an alternative measure of treatment effect owing to its model-free structure and clinically meaningful interpretation of treatment benefit for right-censored data. In clinical trials, another type of censoring called interval censoring may occur if subjects are examined at several discrete time points and the survival time falls into an interval rather than being exactly observed. The missingness of exact observations under interval-censored cases makes the nonparametric measure of treatment effect more challenging. Employing the linear smoothing technique to overcome the ambiguity, we propose a new model-free measure for the interval-censored RMST. As an alternative to the commonly used log-rank test, we further construct a hypothesis testing procedure to assess the survival difference between two groups. Simulation studies show that the bias of our proposed interval-censored RMST estimator is negligible and the testing procedure delivers promising performance in detecting between-group difference with regard to size and power under various configurations of survival curves. The proposed method is illustrated by reanalyzing two real datasets containing interval-censored observations.
限制平均生存时间 (RMST) 评估了截至特定时间点的无事件平均生存时间。由于其无模型结构和对右删失数据的治疗益处的临床有意义解释,它已被用作治疗效果的替代衡量标准。在临床试验中,如果受试者在几个离散时间点接受检查,并且生存时间落入一个区间而不是被准确观察到,则可能会发生另一种称为区间删失的删失类型。在区间删失情况下,确切观察值的缺失使得非参数治疗效果衡量更加具有挑战性。我们采用线性平滑技术来克服这种模糊性,提出了一种新的区间删失 RMST 的无模型衡量方法。作为对常用对数秩检验的替代,我们进一步构建了一个假设检验程序来评估两组之间的生存差异。模拟研究表明,我们提出的区间删失 RMST 估计量的偏差可以忽略不计,并且该检验程序在各种生存曲线配置下,在大小和功效方面都具有很好的检测组间差异的性能。该方法通过重新分析两个包含区间删失观察值的真实数据集进行了说明。