Department of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Medical Research and Biometrics Center, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Beijing, China.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Apr;22(4):751-759.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.06.052. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
There is increasing evidence that muscle volume and mass are poor predictors of muscle strength and physical performance. Other assessments of muscle quality such as skeletal muscle density measured by computed tomography (CT) may be more important. The aim of this study was to explore associations of muscle size and density with handgrip strength (HGS) and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG). We also hypothesized that the strength of these associations would depend on the specific muscle of muscle group, namely trunk, hip, and mid-thigh muscles.
Cross-sectional study.
University hospital; 316 volunteers aged 59 to 85 years.
HGS, TUG, and quantitative CT imaging of the lumber, hip, and mid-thigh were performed in volunteers. From the CT images, cross-sectional area and attenuation were determined for the gluteus muscle, trunk muscle at vertebrae L2 level, and mid-thigh muscle.
In men and women, associations of muscle area with TUG were insignificant after adjustment for age, height, and weight. Associations with HGS were only significant in men for the gluteus maximus and the mid-thigh but slopes were rather low (β < 0.20). Associations between muscle density and TUG/HGS were more pronounced, in particular for HGS. After adjustment, associations with TUG were significant in women for the gluteus maximus and trunk muscle even (β -0.06, P .001 and β -0.07, P .031, respectively).
Muscle density is more strongly associated with muscle strength than muscle size andin women muscle density was also more strongly associated than muscle size with physical performance. Therefore, muscle density may represent a more clinically meaningful surrogate of muscle performance than muscle size. Muscle density measurements of trunk and gluteus muscles can be easily obtained from routine CT scan and, therefore, may become an important measurement to diagnose and screen for sarcopenia.
越来越多的证据表明,肌肉体积和质量是肌肉力量和身体表现的不良预测指标。其他肌肉质量评估,如计算机断层扫描(CT)测量的骨骼肌密度可能更为重要。本研究旨在探讨肌肉大小和密度与握力(HGS)和计时起立行走测试(TUG)的关系。我们还假设,这些关联的强度将取决于特定的肌肉或肌肉群,即躯干、臀部和大腿中部肌肉。
横断面研究。
大学医院;316 名年龄在 59 至 85 岁之间的志愿者。
在志愿者中进行 HGS、TUG 和腰椎、臀部和大腿中部的定量 CT 成像。从 CT 图像中确定臀肌、L2 椎体水平的躯干肌肉和大腿中部肌肉的横截面积和衰减。
在男性和女性中,肌肉面积与 TUG 的相关性在调整年龄、身高和体重后无统计学意义。与 HGS 的相关性仅在男性的臀大肌和大腿中部有意义,但斜率较低(β<0.20)。肌肉密度与 TUG/HGS 的相关性更为显著,特别是对于 HGS。调整后,女性臀大肌和躯干肌肉的 TUG 相关性有统计学意义(β-0.06,P<.001 和 β-0.07,P<.031)。
肌肉密度与肌肉力量的相关性强于肌肉大小,在女性中,肌肉密度与身体表现的相关性也强于肌肉大小。因此,肌肉密度可能比肌肉大小更能代表肌肉功能的临床有意义的替代指标。躯干和臀肌的肌肉密度测量可以从常规 CT 扫描中轻松获得,因此可能成为诊断和筛查肌肉减少症的重要测量指标。