Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA; Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.
Cardiovascular & Metabolic Disorders Programme, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore; SingHealth Duke-National University of Singapore Emergency Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, Singapore; SingHealth Emergency Medicine Residency Programme, Singapore.
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e428-e436. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30140-7.
Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases an individual's chance of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but the frequency of bystander CPR is low in many communities. We aimed to assess the cumulative effect of CPR-targeted public health interventions in Singapore, which were incrementally introduced between 2012 and 2016.
We did a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of adult, non-traumatic OHCAs, through the Singapore registry. National interventions introduced during this time included emergency services interventions, as well as dispatch-assisted CPR (introduced on July 1, 2012), a training programme for CPR and automated external defibrillators (April 1, 2014), and a first responder mobile application (myResponder; April 17, 2015). Using multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression, we modelled the likelihood of receiving bystander CPR with the increasing number of interventions, accounting for year as a random effect.
The Singapore registry contained 11 465 OHCA events between Jan 1, 2011, and Dec 31, 2016. Paediatric arrests, arrests witnessed by emergency medical services, and healthcare-facility arrests were excluded, and 6788 events were analysed. Bystander CPR was administered in 3248 (48%) of 6788 events. Compared with no intervention, likelihood of bystander CPR was not significantly altered by the addition of emergency medical services interventions (odds ratio [OR] 1·33 [95% CI 0·98-1·79]; p=0·065), but increased with implementation of dispatch-assisted CPR (3·72 [2·84-4·88]; p<0·0001), with addition of the CPR and automated external defibrillator training programme (6·16 [4·66-8·14]; p<0·0001), and with addition of the myResponder application (7·66 [5·85-10·03]; p<0·0001). Survival to hospital discharge increased after the addition of all interventions, compared with no intervention (OR 3·10 [95% CI 1·53-6·26]; p<0·0001).
National bystander-focused public health interventions were associated with an increased likelihood of bystander CPR, and an increased survival to hospital discharge. Understanding the combined impact of public health interventions might improve strategies to increase the likelihood of bystander CPR, and inform targeted initiatives to improve survival from OHCA.
National Medical Research Council, Clinician Scientist Award, Singapore and Ministry of Health, Health Services Research Grant, Singapore.
旁观者心肺复苏术(CPR)可提高个体在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)中的生存机会,但在许多社区旁观者 CPR 的频率都很低。我们旨在评估 2012 年至 2016 年间在新加坡逐步引入的以 CPR 为目标的公共卫生干预措施的累积效果。
我们通过新加坡登记处对一项成年非创伤性 OHCA 的前瞻性队列研究进行了二次分析。在此期间,国家干预措施包括紧急服务干预,以及调度协助的 CPR(2012 年 7 月 1 日推出)、CPR 和自动体外除颤器的培训计划(2014 年 4 月 1 日)以及急救人员移动应用程序(myResponder;2015 年 4 月 17 日)。我们使用多水平混合效应逻辑回归模型,在考虑年份为随机效应的情况下,用干预措施的数量来模拟接受旁观者 CPR 的可能性。
新加坡登记处包含 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间 11465 例 OHCA 事件。排除小儿发作、紧急医疗服务目击发作和医疗机构发作,共分析了 6788 例事件。旁观者 CPR 在 6788 例事件中的 3248 例(48%)中进行。与无干预相比,添加紧急医疗服务干预并没有显著改变旁观者 CPR 的可能性(比值比[OR]1.33[95%CI0.98-1.79];p=0.065),但随着调度协助的 CPR 实施(3.72[2.84-4.88];p<0.0001),CPR 和自动体外除颤器培训计划的增加(6.16[4.66-8.14];p<0.0001),以及 myResponder 应用程序的增加(7.66[5.85-10.03];p<0.0001),旁观者 CPR 的可能性增加。与无干预相比,添加所有干预措施后,患者存活至出院的比例增加(OR3.10[95%CI1.53-6.26];p<0.0001)。
以人群为中心的国家公共卫生干预措施与旁观者 CPR 可能性增加和出院存活率提高有关。了解公共卫生干预措施的综合影响可能会改善提高旁观者 CPR 可能性的策略,并为改善 OHCA 患者的生存提供针对性举措。
新加坡国家医学研究委员会,临床科学家奖和新加坡卫生部,卫生服务研究基金。