Wolmark N, Fisher B, Rockette H, Redmond C, Wickerham D L, Fisher E R, Jones J, Glass A, Lerner H, Lawrence W
University of Pittsburgh, PA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988 Mar 2;80(1):30-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/80.1.30.
Data are presented from 1,166 patients with Dukes B and C carcinoma of the colon who were entered into the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol C-01 between November 1977 and February 1983. Patients were randomized to one of three therapeutic categories: 1) no further treatment following curative resection (394 patients); 2) postoperative chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil, semustine, and vincristine (379 patients); or 3) postoperative BCG (393 patients). The average time on study was 77.3 months. A comparison between patients receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and those treated with surgery alone indicated that there was an overall improvement in disease-free survival (P = .02) and survival (P = .05) in favor of the chemotherapy-treated group. At 5 years of follow-up, patients treated with surgery alone were at 1.29 times the risk of developing a treatment failure and at 1.31 times the likelihood of dying as were similar patients treated with combination adjuvant chemotherapy. Comparison of the BCG-treated group with the group treated with surgery alone indicated that there was no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (P = .09). There was, however, a survival advantage in favor of the BCG-treated group (P = .03). At 5 years of follow-up, patients randomized to the surgery-alone arm were at 1.28 times the risk of dying as were similar patients treated with BCG. Further investigation disclosed that this survival advantage in favor of BCG was a result of a diminution in deaths that were non-cancer related. When analyses were conducted on which events not related to cancer recurrence were eliminated, the survival difference between the BCG and control groups became nonsignificant (P = .40); the cumulative odds at 5 years decreased from 1.28 to 1.10. The findings from this study are the first from a randomized prospective clinical trial to demonstrate that a significant disease-free survival and survival benefit can be achieved with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Dukes B and C carcinoma of the colon who have undergone curative resection.
数据来自1977年11月至1983年2月期间参加国家外科辅助乳腺和肠道项目(NSABP)C - 01方案的1166例患有结肠癌Dukes B期和C期的患者。患者被随机分为三个治疗组之一:1)根治性切除术后不再接受进一步治疗(394例患者);2)术后化疗,包括5 - 氟尿嘧啶、司莫司汀和长春新碱(379例患者);或3)术后卡介苗治疗(393例患者)。研究的平均时间为77.3个月。接受术后辅助化疗的患者与仅接受手术治疗的患者之间的比较表明,化疗治疗组在无病生存期(P = 0.02)和生存期(P = 0.05)方面总体有所改善。在5年随访时,仅接受手术治疗的患者发生治疗失败的风险是接受联合辅助化疗的类似患者的1.29倍,死亡可能性是其1.31倍。卡介苗治疗组与仅接受手术治疗的组的比较表明,无病生存期无统计学显著差异(P = 0.09)。然而,卡介苗治疗组有生存优势(P = 0.03)。在5年随访时,随机分配到单纯手术组的患者死亡风险是接受卡介苗治疗的类似患者的1.28倍。进一步调查发现,这种有利于卡介苗的生存优势是与癌症无关的死亡减少的结果。当对消除了与癌症复发无关的事件进行分析时,卡介苗组和对照组之间的生存差异变得不显著(P = 0.40);5年时的累积比值从1.28降至1.10。这项研究的结果是首次来自随机前瞻性临床试验,证明对于接受了根治性切除的结肠癌Dukes B期和C期患者,术后辅助化疗可实现显著的无病生存期和生存获益。