E. Costa-Drolon is physician, Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie de l'Adolescent, Argenteuil Hospital Centre, Argenteuil, France.
L. Verneuil is professor of medicine, Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, ECSTRRA Team UMR-1153, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Acad Med. 2021 Jan 1;96(1):142-154. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003655.
Some evidence indicates that physician empathy declines during medical training, which has made it the subject of much research. Qualitative studies are relevant in this context, focusing as they do on how students themselves conceive and understand empathy during medical school. The aim of this study was to explore medical students' perspectives on empathy by conducting a metasynthesis, including a systematic review of the literature and analysis of included studies.
The authors systematically searched 4 databases through June 17, 2019, for qualitative studies reporting medical students' perspectives on empathy in medical school. They assessed article quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program, and they applied thematic analysis to identify key themes and synthesize them.
The authors included 35 articles from 18 countries in their analysis. Four main themes emerged: (1) Defining empathy, with a lack of understanding of the concept; (2) Teaching empathy, with a focus on the hidden curriculum and clinical supervisors; (3) Willingness to be an empathetic doctor, with ambivalence expressed by some study participants; and (4) Evolution of empathy during medical school, specifically its decline.
Medical students are beset by theoretical confusion regarding the concept of empathy, and they express doubts about its utility and relevance. Instruction should focus on simpler concepts such as listening, and schools should leverage clinical supervisors' strong influence on students' empathy. Prioritizing certain types of knowledge (clinical facts) during medical education has a globally negative effect on medical students' empathy.
有证据表明,医生的同理心在医学培训期间会下降,这使得同理心成为了大量研究的主题。在这种情况下,定性研究很重要,因为它们关注的是学生自己在医学院期间如何构想和理解同理心。本研究旨在通过元综合,包括对文献的系统回顾和对纳入研究的分析,探讨医学生对同理心的看法。
作者通过 6 月 17 日之前系统地在 4 个数据库中搜索了报告医学生在医学院期间对同理心看法的定性研究。他们使用批判性评价技能计划评估文章质量,并应用主题分析来确定关键主题并对其进行综合。
作者在分析中纳入了来自 18 个国家的 35 篇文章。出现了四个主要主题:(1)定义同理心,对概念缺乏理解;(2)同理心教学,重点是隐性课程和临床导师;(3)愿意成为有同理心的医生,一些研究参与者表示犹豫不决;(4)医学学校期间同理心的演变,特别是其下降。
医学生对同理心概念感到困惑,并对其效用和相关性表示怀疑。教学应侧重于更简单的概念,如倾听,学校应利用临床导师对学生同理心的强烈影响。在医学教育中优先考虑某些类型的知识(临床事实)会对医学生的同理心产生全球性的负面影响。