Department of Pharmacology, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 31;24(1):951. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05962-6.
A physician's empathy level substantially impacts clinical competence, patient relationships, and treatment outcomes. Yet, understanding empathy trends from medical students to resident doctors within a single institution is limited. This study delves into empathy trends within a single-center academic setting and identifies factors associated with low empathy.
This cross-sectional study enrolled the second-to sixth-year medical students of Phramongkutklao College of Medicine and the first-to second-year residents at Phramongkutklao Hospital. It utilized a standardized questionnaire covering demographics, family relationships, the Maudsley Personality Inventory (MPI), and the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE). The relationship between variables and JSE scores was analyzed using independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Chi-square tests. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses examined associated factors and trends across educational levels. A quadratic term was incorporated to evaluate the presence of a nonlinear trend.
A total of 520 participants, comprising 189 (36.4%) preclinical students, 153 (29.4%) clinical students, and 178 (34.2%) residents, completed the survey. The JSE showed a Cronbach's alpha of 0.83. The average empathy score was 103.8 ± 15.0, with 27.1% of low empathy levels. Specialty preference and sex-adjusted average empathy scores decreased from 114.5 (95%CI: 112.0-117.0) among second-year medical students to 95.2 (95%CI: 92.2-98.2) among second-year residents (P<0.001). The adjusted proportion of low empathy is highest among sixth-year medical students (54.4%, 95%CI: 34.4-73.2%). Factors associated with low empathy included those preferring procedure-oriented specialties (AOR: 4.16, 95%CI: 1.54-11.18) and a higher parental income (AOR: 2.97, 95%CI: 1.09 to 8.10). Subgroup analysis revealed that residents with a GPAX above 3.5 and those in technology-oriented specialties were also associated with lower empathy (AOR: 3.46, 95%CI: 1.40-8.59 and AOR: 2.93, 95%CI: 1.05-8.12, respectively).
A declining empathy trend was observed among medical students, which then plateaued among residents. Additionally, residents in technology-oriented specialties may require empathy enhancements due to their ongoing patient consultations. Addressing these issues requires collaborative planning between students and teachers to foster empathy throughout the medical curriculum.
医生的同理心水平对临床能力、医患关系和治疗效果有重大影响。然而,在单一机构内了解医学生到住院医师之间同理心的趋势是有限的。本研究深入探讨了单一中心学术环境中的同理心趋势,并确定了与同理心水平低相关的因素。
本横断面研究纳入了玛希隆大学医学院二至六年级医学生和玛希隆大学医院一至二年级住院医师。研究采用标准化问卷,涵盖人口统计学、家庭关系、莫德斯利人格量表(MPI)和杰斐逊同理心量表(JSE)。使用独立 t 检验、单因素方差分析和卡方检验分析变量与 JSE 评分之间的关系。多变量逻辑回归和线性回归分析用于研究相关因素和不同教育水平之间的趋势。采用二次项来评估是否存在非线性趋势。
共有 520 名参与者完成了调查,包括 189 名(36.4%)预科学生、153 名(29.4%)临床学生和 178 名(34.2%)住院医师。JSE 的克朗巴赫α系数为 0.83。平均同理心得分为 103.8±15.0,其中 27.1%的人同理心水平较低。经过专业偏好和性别调整后的平均同理心评分从二年级医学生的 114.5(95%CI:112.0-117.0)下降到二年级住院医师的 95.2(95%CI:92.2-98.2)(P<0.001)。在六年级医学生中,同理心水平较低的比例最高(54.4%,95%CI:34.4-73.2%)。与同理心水平较低相关的因素包括偏爱以程序为导向的专业(优势比:4.16,95%CI:1.54-11.18)和较高的父母收入(优势比:2.97,95%CI:1.09-8.10)。亚组分析显示,平均绩点(GPAX)高于 3.5 和从事技术导向专业的住院医师也与同理心水平较低相关(优势比:3.46,95%CI:1.40-8.59 和优势比:2.93,95%CI:1.05-8.12)。
医学生的同理心呈下降趋势,随后在住院医师中趋于平稳。此外,从事技术导向专业的住院医师可能需要增强同理心,因为他们需要持续与患者进行咨询。解决这些问题需要学生和教师共同规划,在整个医学课程中培养同理心。