Haukeland University Hospital, Kronstad DPS, Pb 1400, 5021, Bergen, Norway.
Centre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Pb. 7804, 5020, Bergen, Norway.
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 8;20(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02770-2.
In 2016, the Western Norway Regional Health Authority started to integrate more evidence-based psychosocial interventions into the existing mental health care, emphasizing the right for persons with psychosis to choose medication-free treatment. This change emerged from the debate on the effectiveness and adverse effects of the use of antipsychotic medication. Aspects beyond symptom reduction, such as interpersonal relationships, increased understanding of one's own pattern of suffering, hope and motivation, are all considered important for the personal recovery process.
This study explores whether these aspects were present in users' descriptions of their recovery processes within the medication-free treatment programme in Bergen, Western Norway. We interviewed ten patients diagnosed with psychosis who were eligible for medication-free services about their treatment experiences. Data were analysed using Attride-Stirling's thematic network approach.
The findings show a global theme relating to personal recovery processes facilitated by the provision of more psychosocial treatment options, with three organizing subthemes: interpersonal relationships between patients and therapists, the patient's understanding of personal patterns of suffering, and personal motivation for self-agency in the recovery process. Participants described an improved relationship with therapists compared to previous experiences. Integrating more evidence-based psychosocial interventions into existing mental health services facilitated learning experiences regarding the choice of treatment, particularly the discontinuation of medication, and appeared to support participants' increased self-agency and motivation in their personal recovery processes.
Health care in Norway is perhaps one step closer to optimizing care for people with psychosis, allowing for more patient choice and improving the dialogue and hence the interpersonal relationship between the patient and the therapist. Personal patterns of suffering can be explored within a system aiming to support and have a higher level of acceptance for the discontinuation of medication. Such a system requires personal agency in the treatment regimen, with more focus on personal coping strategies and more personal responsibility for the recovery process.
2016 年,挪威西部区域卫生局开始将更多基于证据的心理社会干预措施纳入现有的精神卫生保健中,强调精神病患者有权选择非药物治疗。这种转变源于关于使用抗精神病药物的有效性和不良反应的争论。除了症状减轻之外,人际关系、对自身痛苦模式的理解、希望和动力等方面都被认为对个人康复过程很重要。
本研究探讨了在卑尔根的非药物治疗计划中,这些方面是否存在于患者对自己非药物治疗经历的描述中。我们对 10 名符合非药物治疗条件的精神病患者进行了访谈,了解他们的治疗经验。使用 Attride-Stirling 的主题网络方法对数据进行分析。
研究结果表明,一个与通过提供更多心理社会治疗选择促进个人康复过程有关的总体主题,有三个组织性副主题:患者与治疗师之间的人际关系、患者对个人痛苦模式的理解以及个人在康复过程中自我决策的动机。与之前的经历相比,参与者描述了与治疗师关系的改善。将更多基于证据的心理社会干预措施纳入现有的精神卫生服务中,促进了关于治疗选择的学习经验,特别是停止药物治疗,这似乎支持了参与者在个人康复过程中增强的自我决策和动力。
挪威的医疗保健可能又向优化精神病患者的护理迈进了一步,为患者提供了更多的选择,并改善了医患之间的对话和人际关系。可以在一个旨在支持和对停止药物治疗有更高接受度的系统中探讨个人痛苦模式。这样的系统需要在治疗方案中具有个人能动性,更注重个人应对策略,并对康复过程承担更多的个人责任。