School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Mar 1;11(3):269-276. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.138.
Engaging knowledge users (KUs) as research team members throughout the research process helps generate relevant knowledge and may improve uptake of research results. The purpose of this article is to describe how an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach was embedded within a master's thesis project comprising a mixed-methods systematic review. KUs were engaged in four distinct phases of the systematic review process, including (1) proposal development; (2) development of the research question and approach; (3) creation of an advisory panel; and (4) an end of study meeting to interpret findings and plan dissemination of findings. The extent of each KU's engagement on the research team fluctuated during the study. Challenges included maintaining the same KUs throughout the project and maintaining the scope of the project to align with a master's thesis. Our suggestions for optimizing graduate student iKT projects include having regular team meetings and periodically checking in with team members to encourage reflection on overall engagement and progress of the project. Overall, KUs helped create a research project designed to address their needs and provided input on how results might translate into implications for clinical practice, education, academic policy, and future research within their respective contexts.
让知识用户(KUs)作为研究团队成员全程参与研究,有助于生成相关知识,并可能提高研究成果的应用。本文旨在描述一种综合知识转化(iKT)方法如何嵌入到一个由混合方法系统评价组成的硕士论文项目中。KUs 参与了系统评价过程的四个不同阶段,包括(1)方案制定;(2)研究问题和方法的制定;(3)顾问小组的创建;以及(4)结束研究会议,以解释研究结果并计划传播研究结果。在研究过程中,每个 KU 在研究团队中的参与程度都有所波动。面临的挑战包括在整个项目中保持相同的 KU 数量,以及保持项目的范围与硕士论文一致。我们优化研究生 iKT 项目的建议包括定期召开团队会议,并定期与团队成员进行沟通,以鼓励他们对整体参与度和项目进展进行反思。总体而言,KUs 帮助创建了一个旨在满足他们需求的研究项目,并就如何将研究结果转化为对其各自背景下的临床实践、教育、学术政策和未来研究的影响提供了意见。