Suppr超能文献

耐药相关替换的流行情况以及接受 glecaprevir/pibrentasvir 方案治疗失败的患者的再治疗。

Prevalence of resistance-associated substitutions and retreatment of patients failing a glecaprevir/pibrentasvir regimen.

机构信息

Clinical Microbiology Unit, University Hospital San Cecilio, Instituto de Investigacion Ibs.Granada. Granada, Spain.

Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), External Partner Site, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Nov 1;75(11):3349-3358. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa304.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) as well as retreatment efficacies in a large cohort of European patients with failure of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir.

METHODS

Patients were identified from three European Resistance Reference centres in Spain, Italy and Germany. Sequencing of NS3, NS5A and NS5B was conducted and substitutions associated with resistance to direct antiviral agents were analysed. Clinical and virological parameters were documented retrospectively and retreatment efficacies were evaluated.

RESULTS

We evaluated 90 glecaprevir/pibrentasvir failures [3a (n = 36), 1a (n = 23), 2a/2c (n = 20), 1b (n = 10) and 4d (n = 1)]. Ten patients were cirrhotic, two had previous exposure to PEG-interferon and seven were coinfected with HIV; 80 had been treated for 8 weeks. Overall, 31 patients (34.4%) failed glecaprevir/pibrentasvir without any NS3 or NS5A RASs, 62.4% (53/85) showed RASs in NS5A, 15.6% (13/83) in NS3 and 10% (9/90) in both NS5A and NS3. Infection with HCV genotypes 1a and 3a was associated with a higher prevalence of NS5A RASs. Patients harbouring two (n = 34) or more (n = 8) RASs in NS5A were frequent. Retreatment was initiated in 56 patients, almost all (n = 52) with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir. The overall sustained virological response rate was 97.8% in patients with end-of-follow-up data available.

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of patients failed glecaprevir/pibrentasvir without resistance. RASs in NS5A were more prevalent than in NS3 and were frequently observed as dual and triple combination patterns, with a high impact on NS5A inhibitor activity, particularly in genotypes 1a and 3a. Retreatment of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir failures with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir achieved viral suppression across all genotypes.

摘要

目的

研究在一大群欧洲格卡瑞韦/哌仑他韦治疗失败的患者中,耐药相关替换(RAS)以及再治疗效果。

方法

在西班牙、意大利和德国的三个欧洲耐药参考中心鉴定了患者。对 NS3、NS5A 和 NS5B 进行了测序,并分析了与直接抗病毒药物耐药相关的替换。回顾性记录了临床和病毒学参数,并评估了再治疗效果。

结果

我们评估了 90 例格卡瑞韦/哌仑他韦治疗失败的病例[3a(n=36)、1a(n=23)、2a/2c(n=20)、1b(n=10)和 4d(n=1)]。10 例患者为肝硬化,2 例有聚乙二醇干扰素暴露史,7 例为 HIV 合并感染;80 例接受了 8 周的治疗。总体而言,31 例(34.4%)患者在无任何 NS3 或 NS5A RAS 的情况下未能接受格卡瑞韦/哌仑他韦治疗,62.4%(53/85)患者在 NS5A 中出现 RAS,15.6%(13/83)在 NS3 中出现 RAS,10%(9/90)在 NS5A 和 NS3 中均出现 RAS。HCV 基因型 1a 和 3a 感染与 NS5A RAS 更高的发生率相关。在 NS5A 中携带两个(n=34)或更多(n=8)RAS 的患者较为常见。56 例患者开始了再治疗,几乎所有(n=52)患者都接受了索磷布韦/维帕他韦/伏西瑞韦治疗。在有随访数据的患者中,总体持续病毒学应答率为 97.8%。

结论

三分之一的格卡瑞韦/哌仑他韦治疗失败的患者无耐药。NS5A 中的 RAS 比 NS3 更为常见,且常以双重和三重组合模式出现,对 NS5A 抑制剂活性的影响较大,特别是在基因型 1a 和 3a 中。用索磷布韦/维帕他韦/伏西瑞韦治疗格卡瑞韦/哌仑他韦治疗失败的患者,所有基因型均实现了病毒抑制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验