Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia, Canada.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2020 Aug;82:104-113. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
In his book, The Material Theory of Induction, Norton argues that the quest for a universal formal theory or 'schema' for analogical inference should be abandoned. In its place, he offers the "material theory of analogy": each analogical inference is "powered" by a local fact of analogy rather than by any formal schema. His minimalist model promises a straightforward, fact-based approach to the evaluation and justification of analogical inferences. This paper argues that although the rejection of universal schemas is justified, Norton's positive theory is limited in scope: it works well only for a restricted class of analogical inferences. Both facts and quasi-formal criteria have roles to play in a theory of analogical reasoning.
在他的著作《归纳的物理论》中,诺顿认为,寻求普遍的形式理论或“模式”来进行类比推理应该被放弃。取而代之的是,他提出了“类比的物理论”:每一个类比推理都是由类比的局部事实而不是任何形式的模式“驱动”的。他的最小主义模型承诺了一种直接的、基于事实的方法来评估和证明类比推理。本文认为,尽管拒绝普遍模式是合理的,但诺顿的积极理论在范围上是有限的:它只适用于一类有限的类比推理。在类比推理理论中,事实和准形式标准都有其作用。