• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格对糖尿病患者使用移动医疗的影响:前瞻性试点研究。

Influence of Personality on mHealth Use in Patients with Diabetes: Prospective Pilot Study.

机构信息

eHealth Research Institute, School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China.

Center for Health Information & Decision Systems, Department of Decision, Operations, and Information Technologies, Robert H Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 10;8(8):e17709. doi: 10.2196/17709.

DOI:10.2196/17709
PMID:32773382
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7445619/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mobile technology for health (mHealth) interventions are increasingly being used to help improve self-management among patients with diabetes; however, these interventions have not been adopted by a large number of patients and often have high dropout rates. Patient personality characteristics may play a critical role in app adoption and active utilization, but few studies have focused on addressing this question.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to address a gap in understanding of the relationship between personality traits and mHealth treatment for patients with diabetes. We tested the role of the five-factor model of personality traits (openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism) in mHealth adoption preference and active utilization.

METHODS

We developed an mHealth app (DiaSocial) aimed to encourage diabetes self-management. We recruited 98 patients with diabetes-each patient freely chose whether to receive the standard care or the mHealth app intervention. Patient demographic information and patient personality characteristics were assessed at baseline. App usage data were collected to measure user utilization of the app. Patient health outcomes were assessed with lab measures of glycated hemoglobin (HbA level). Logistic regression models and linear regression were employed to explore factors predicting the relationship between mHealth use (adoption and active utilization) and changes in health outcome.

RESULTS

Of 98 study participants, 46 (47%) downloaded and used the app. Relatively younger patients with diabetes were 9% more likely to try and use the app (P=.02, odds ratio [OR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.98) than older patients with diabetes were. Extraversion was negatively associated with adoption of the mHealth app (P=.04, OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.98), and openness to experience was positively associated with adoption of the app (P=.03, OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.07-2.80). Gender (P=.43, OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.23-1.88), education (senior: P=.99, OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.32-3.11; higher: P=.21, OR 2.51, 95% CI 0.59-10.66), and baseline HbA level (P=.36, OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.47-1.31) were not associated with app adoption. Among those who adopted the app, a low education level (senior versus primary P=.003; higher versus primary P=.03) and a high level of openness to experience (P=.048, OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.01-4.00) were associated with active app utilization. Active users showed a significantly greater decrease in HbA level than other users (ΔHbA=-0.64, P=.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the first studies to investigate how different personality traits influence the adoption and active utilization of an mHealth app among patients with diabetes. The research findings suggest that personality is a factor that should be considered when trying to identify patients who would benefit the most from apps for diabetes management.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d87/7445619/be62731abab8/mhealth_v8i8e17709_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d87/7445619/8ede24722da8/mhealth_v8i8e17709_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d87/7445619/be62731abab8/mhealth_v8i8e17709_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d87/7445619/8ede24722da8/mhealth_v8i8e17709_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d87/7445619/be62731abab8/mhealth_v8i8e17709_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

移动医疗技术(mHealth)干预措施正越来越多地被用于帮助改善糖尿病患者的自我管理;然而,这些干预措施并没有被大量患者采用,并且经常出现高退出率。患者的个性特征可能在应用程序的采用和积极利用中起着至关重要的作用,但很少有研究关注这个问题。

目的

本研究旨在填补理解个性特征与糖尿病患者的 mHealth 治疗之间关系的空白。我们测试了五因素人格模型(开放性、尽责性、外向性、宜人性和神经质)在 mHealth 采用偏好和积极利用中的作用。

方法

我们开发了一个 mHealth 应用程序(DiaSocial),旨在鼓励糖尿病自我管理。我们招募了 98 名糖尿病患者-每个患者都可以自由选择接受标准护理或 mHealth 应用程序干预。在基线时评估了患者的人口统计学信息和患者的个性特征。收集应用程序使用数据来衡量用户对应用程序的使用情况。使用实验室测量的糖化血红蛋白(HbA 水平)来评估患者的健康结果。采用逻辑回归模型和线性回归来探讨预测 mHealth 使用(采用和积极利用)与健康结果变化之间关系的因素。

结果

在 98 名研究参与者中,有 46 名(47%)下载并使用了该应用程序。相对较年轻的糖尿病患者尝试和使用该应用程序的可能性比年长的糖尿病患者高 9%(P=.02,优势比[OR]0.91,95%置信区间[CI]0.85-0.98)。外向性与 mHealth 应用程序的采用呈负相关(P=.04,OR 0.71,95%CI 0.51-0.98),开放性与应用程序的采用呈正相关(P=.03,OR 1.73,95%CI 1.07-2.80)。性别(P=.43,OR 0.66,95%CI 0.23-1.88)、教育(高中:P=.99,OR 1.00,95%CI 0.32-3.11;更高:P=.21,OR 2.51,95%CI 0.59-10.66)和基线 HbA 水平(P=.36,OR 0.79,95%CI 0.47-1.31)与应用程序的采用无关。在那些采用该应用程序的患者中,低教育水平(高中与初级 P=.003;更高与初级 P=.03)和高开放性(P=.048,OR 2.01,95%CI 1.01-4.00)与积极使用应用程序有关。积极用户的 HbA 水平下降幅度明显大于其他用户(ΔHbA=-0.64,P=.05)。

结论

这是首批研究个性特征如何影响糖尿病患者对 mHealth 应用程序的采用和积极利用的研究之一。研究结果表明,在试图确定最能从糖尿病管理应用程序中受益的患者时,个性是一个需要考虑的因素。

相似文献

1
Influence of Personality on mHealth Use in Patients with Diabetes: Prospective Pilot Study.人格对糖尿病患者使用移动医疗的影响:前瞻性试点研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 10;8(8):e17709. doi: 10.2196/17709.
2
Motivating Adherence to Exercise Plans Through a Personalized Mobile Health App: Enhanced Action Design Research Approach.通过个性化移动健康应用程序激励对锻炼计划的坚持:增强的行动设计研究方法。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 2;9(6):e19941. doi: 10.2196/19941.
3
Influence of Personality and Differences in Stress Processing Among Finnish Students on Interest to Use a Mobile Stress Management App: Survey Study.芬兰学生的人格及压力处理差异对使用移动压力管理应用程序兴趣的影响:调查研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 May 13;6(5):e10039. doi: 10.2196/10039.
4
Factors Associated With Intention to Adopt mHealth Apps Among Dementia Caregivers With a Chronic Condition: Cross-sectional, Correlational Study.与患有慢性病的痴呆症照护者采用移动医疗应用意愿相关的因素:横断面、相关性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Aug 31;9(8):e27926. doi: 10.2196/27926.
5
Who is Tracking Health on Mobile Devices: Behavioral Logfile Analysis in Hong Kong.谁在移动设备上追踪健康数据:香港的行为日志文件分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 23;7(5):e13679. doi: 10.2196/13679.
6
General Behavioral Engagement and Changes in Clinical and Cognitive Outcomes of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Using the Time2Focus Mobile App for Diabetes Education: Pilot Evaluation.使用 Time2Focus 移动应用程序进行糖尿病教育对 2 型糖尿病患者的一般行为参与度和临床及认知结果的改变:初步评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e17537. doi: 10.2196/17537.
7
User-Dependent Usability and Feasibility of a Swallowing Training mHealth App for Older Adults: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.用户依赖性与吞咽训练移动健康应用于老年人的可行性:混合方法初步研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 27;8(7):e19585. doi: 10.2196/19585.
8
Influence of the Business Revenue, Recommendation, and Provider Models on Mobile Health App Adoption: Three-Country Experimental Vignette Study.商业收益、推荐和提供模式对移动健康应用采纳的影响:三国实验情景研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 4;8(6):e17272. doi: 10.2196/17272.
9
Attitudes Toward Using COVID-19 mHealth Tools Among Adults With Chronic Health Conditions: Secondary Data Analysis of the COVID-19 Impact Survey.慢性病患者对使用 COVID-19 移动医疗工具的态度:COVID-19 影响调查的二次数据分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Dec 17;8(12):e24693. doi: 10.2196/24693.
10
The Synergistic Effect of Nurse Proactive Phone Calls With an mHealth App Program on Sustaining App Usage: 3-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.护士主动电话与移动医疗应用程序相结合对维持应用程序使用的协同效应:三臂随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 1;25:e43678. doi: 10.2196/43678.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality-Driven Variations in Fitness App Affordance Actualization Among Adults: Quantitative Survey Study.成年人中健身应用功能实现的个性驱动差异:定量调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Sep 12;9:e72691. doi: 10.2196/72691.
2
Completion and Compliance Rates for an Intensive mHealth Study Design to Promote Self-Awareness and Self-Care Among Care Partners of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项强化移动健康研究设计的完成率和依从率,该设计旨在提高创伤性脑损伤患者护理伙伴的自我意识和自我护理能力:一项随机对照试验的二次分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Aug 21;13:e73772. doi: 10.2196/73772.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Acceptance of mHealth Apps for Self-Management Among People with Hypertension.高血压患者对用于自我管理的移动健康应用程序的接受度。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Sep 3;267:282-288. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190839.
2
Standards of medical care for type 2 diabetes in China 2019.中国 2019 年 2 型糖尿病医学诊疗标准。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019 Sep;35(6):e3158. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3158. Epub 2019 May 29.
3
Adherence to a Mindfulness and Relaxation Self-Care App for Cancer Patients: Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study.癌症患者对正念与放松自我护理应用程序的依从性:混合方法可行性研究。
User Engagement With mHealth Interventions to Promote Treatment Adherence and Self-Management in People With Chronic Health Conditions: Systematic Review.
用户对移动医疗干预措施的参与度,以促进慢性病患者的治疗依从性和自我管理:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 24;26:e50508. doi: 10.2196/50508.
4
The Association Between Personality Traits and Health-Related Quality of Life and the Mediating Role of Smoking: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.人格特质与健康相关生活质量的关系及吸烟的中介作用:全国性横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jul 5;10:e51416. doi: 10.2196/51416.
5
Acceptability of Mobile App-Based Motivational Interviewing and Preferences for App Features to Support Self-Management in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Qualitative Study.基于移动应用的动机性访谈的可接受性以及支持2型糖尿病患者自我管理的应用功能偏好:定性研究
JMIR Diabetes. 2024 Mar 6;9:e48310. doi: 10.2196/48310.
6
Understanding inherent influencing factors to digital health adoption in general practices through a mixed-methods analysis.通过混合方法分析了解影响全科医疗中数字健康采用的内在因素。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Feb 27;7(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01049-0.
7
Big 5 Personality Traits and Individual- and Practice-Related Characteristics as Influencing Factors of Digital Maturity in General Practices: Quantitative Web-Based Survey Study.大五人格特质与个体及实践相关特征对一般实践中数字化成熟度的影响因素:基于网络的定量调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 22;26:e52085. doi: 10.2196/52085.
8
Associations Between Psychosocial Needs, Carbohydrate-Counting Behavior, and App Satisfaction: A Randomized Crossover App Trial on 92 Adults With Diabetes.心理社会需求、碳水化合物计数行为与应用程序满意度之间的关联:一项针对 92 名糖尿病成人的随机交叉应用程序试验。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2023 Dec 1;41(12):1026-1036. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001073.
9
Associations between adoption of eHealth management module and optimal control of HbA1c in diabetes patients.糖尿病患者采用电子健康管理模块与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的最佳控制之间的关联。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Apr 13;6(1):67. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00807-w.
10
Willingness to Use Mobile Health Devices in the Post-COVID-19 Era: Nationwide Cross-sectional Study in China.后 COVID-19 时代使用移动医疗设备的意愿:中国全国性横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 17;25:e44225. doi: 10.2196/44225.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Dec 6;6(12):e11271. doi: 10.2196/11271.
4
Functionality, Implementation, Impact, and the Role of Health Literacy in Mobile Phone Apps for Gestational Diabetes: Scoping Review.功能、实施、影响以及健康素养在妊娠期糖尿病手机应用中的作用:范围综述
JMIR Diabetes. 2017 Oct 4;2(2):e25. doi: 10.2196/diabetes.8045.
5
Trading pounds for points: Engagement and weight loss in a mobile health intervention.用英镑换积分:移动健康干预中的参与度与体重减轻
Digit Health. 2017 Apr 24;3:2055207617702252. doi: 10.1177/2055207617702252. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
6
Individual differences in regulatory mode moderate the effectiveness of a pilot mHealth trial for diabetes management among older veterans.个体调节模式的差异会影响试点移动医疗试验在老年退伍军人糖尿病管理中的效果。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0192807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192807. eCollection 2018.
7
Attitudes Toward e-Mental Health Services in a Community Sample of Adults: Online Survey.成年人社区样本对电子心理健康服务的态度:在线调查
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 19;20(2):e59. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9109.
8
Mobile Diabetes Intervention Study of Patient Engagement and Impact on Blood Glucose: Mixed Methods Analysis.患者参与度及对血糖影响的移动糖尿病干预研究:混合方法分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Feb 2;6(2):e31. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9265.
9
Usability and clinical efficacy of diabetes mobile applications for adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.2型糖尿病成人患者糖尿病移动应用程序的可用性与临床疗效:一项系统评价。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Sep;131:70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.06.016. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
10
Prevalence and Ethnic Pattern of Diabetes and Prediabetes in China in 2013.2013年中国糖尿病及糖尿病前期的患病率与民族分布特征
JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2515-2523. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7596.