March Sonja, Day Jamin, Ritchie Gabrielle, Rowe Arlen, Gough Jeffrey, Hall Tanya, Yuen Chin Yan Jackie, Donovan Caroline Leanne, Ireland Michael
Institute for Resilient Regions, School of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 19;20(2):e59. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9109.
Despite evidence that e-mental health services are effective, consumer preferences still appear to be in favor of face-to-face services. However, the theory of planned behavior (TPB) suggests that cognitive intentions are more proximal to behavior and thus may have a more direct influence on service use. Investigating individual characteristics that influence both preferences and intentions to use e-mental health services is important for better understanding factors that might impede or facilitate the use of these services.
This study explores predictors of preferences and intentions to access e-mental health services relative to face-to-face services. Five domains were investigated (demographics, technology factors, personality, psychopathology, and beliefs), identified from previous studies and informed by the Internet interventions model. We expected that more participants would report intentions to use e-mental health services relative to reported preferences for this type of support and that these 5 domains would be significantly associated with both intentions and preferences toward online services.
A mixed sample of 308 community members and university students was recruited through social media and the host institution in Australia. Ages ranged between 17 and 68 years, and 82.5% (254/308) were female. Respondents completed an online survey. Chi-square analysis and t tests were used to explore group differences, and logistic regression models were employed to explore factors predicting preferences and intentions.
Most respondents (85.7%, 264/308) preferred face-to-face services over e-mental health services. Relative to preferences, a larger proportion of respondents (39.6%, 122/308) endorsed intentions to use e-mental health services if experiencing mental health difficulties in the future. In terms of the 5 predictor domains, 95% CIs of odds ratios (OR) derived from bootstrapped standard errors suggested that prior experience with online services significantly predicted intentions to use self-help (95% CI 2.08-16.24) and therapist-assisted (95% CI 1.71-11.90) online services in future. Being older predicted increased intentions to use therapist-assisted online services in future (95% CI 1.01-1.06), as did more confidence using computers and the Internet (95% CI 1.06-2.69). Technology confidence was also found to predict greater preference for online services versus face-to-face options (95% CI 1.24-4.82), whereas higher doctor-related locus of control, or LOC (95% CI 0.76-0.95), and extraversion (95% CI 0.88-1.00) were predictive of lower likelihood of preferring online services relative to face-to-face services.
Despite generally low reported preferences toward e-mental health services, intentions to access these services are higher, raising the question of how to best encourage translation of intentions into behavior (ie, actual use of programs). Strategies designed to ease people into new Internet-based mental health programs (to enhance confidence and familiarity) may be important for increasing the likelihood that they will return to such programs later.
尽管有证据表明电子心理健康服务是有效的,但消费者似乎仍然更喜欢面对面服务。然而,计划行为理论(TPB)表明,认知意图与行为更为接近,因此可能对服务使用有更直接的影响。调查影响使用电子心理健康服务的偏好和意图的个体特征,对于更好地理解可能阻碍或促进这些服务使用的因素非常重要。
本研究探讨相对于面对面服务,使用电子心理健康服务的偏好和意图的预测因素。研究调查了五个领域(人口统计学、技术因素、人格、精神病理学和信念),这些领域是从先前的研究中确定的,并受互联网干预模型的启发。我们预计,相对于报告的对这种类型支持的偏好,会有更多参与者表示有使用电子心理健康服务的意图,并且这五个领域将与对在线服务的意图和偏好显著相关。
通过社交媒体和澳大利亚的主办机构招募了308名社区成员和大学生的混合样本。年龄在17至68岁之间,82.5%(254/308)为女性。受访者完成了一项在线调查。使用卡方分析和t检验来探索组间差异,并使用逻辑回归模型来探索预测偏好和意图的因素。
大多数受访者(85.7%,264/308)更喜欢面对面服务而不是电子心理健康服务。相对于偏好,更大比例的受访者(39.6%,122/308)认可如果未来遇到心理健康困难会有使用电子心理健康服务的意图。在五个预测领域方面,从自展标准误差得出的优势比(OR)的95%置信区间表明,以前的在线服务经验显著预测了未来使用自助(95%置信区间2.08 - 16.24)和治疗师辅助(95%置信区间1.71 - 11.90)在线服务的意图。年龄较大预测未来使用治疗师辅助在线服务的意图增加(95%置信区间1.01 - 1.06),使用计算机和互联网的信心更高也有同样的效果(95%置信区间1.06 - 2.69)。还发现技术信心预测对在线服务相对于面对面选择有更大的偏好(95%置信区间1.24 - 4.82),而与医生相关的更高的控制点(LOC)(95%置信区间0.76 - 0.95)和外向性(95%置信区间0.88 - 1.00)预测相对于面对面服务更喜欢在线服务的可能性较低。
尽管对电子心理健康服务的报告偏好普遍较低,但使用这些服务的意图较高。这就提出了如何最好地鼓励将意图转化为行为(即实际使用项目)的问题。旨在让人们轻松适应新的基于互联网的心理健康项目(以增强信心和熟悉度)的策略,对于增加他们以后返回此类项目的可能性可能很重要。