Department of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Clinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Pain. 2021 Jan;162(1):56-70. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002018.
The differentiation of chronic primary pain syndromes into those with widespread vs regional musculoskeletal pain has been characterized by controversial discussions about common or distinct mechanisms and core clinical and sensory criteria. For example, the recent revision of fibromyalgia criteria has discarded sensory characteristics such as number of "tender points." This study examined empirical evidence related to this diagnostic shift and aimed to identify basic sensory-clinical pain phenotypes in patients with chronic local primary pain (chronic primary back pain [CBP]) and patients with chronic widespread primary pain (fibromyalgia syndrome). Combined sensory-clinical pain phenotypes of 185 patients with previous CBP and fibromyalgia syndrome diagnoses were derived by a stepwise data reduction through descriptive statistical, correlational, principal components and latent class analyses. Clusters were cross-validated by linear discriminant analysis. Four clusters of patients were identified, requiring 4 pressure pain sensitivity markers (number of sensitive tender and control points, pain intensity, and pressure pain threshold at the trapezius) and 2 clinical pain characteristics (pain regions and present pain intensity). Subsequent discriminant analysis revealed that 3 discriminant functions of pressure sensitivity markers sufficed to differentiate the clusters. These sensory-clinical phenotypes differed also in somatic symptoms and impairment but neither in psychopathology nor in psychosocial cofactors. The results highlight the relevance of sensory testing in combination with clinical pain assessment in chronic primary pain syndromes.
慢性原发性疼痛综合征的分类,包括广泛的与局部的肌肉骨骼疼痛,其特征是关于共同或独特机制以及核心临床和感觉标准的有争议的讨论。例如,纤维肌痛标准的最近修订版已经摒弃了诸如“压痛点数”等感觉特征。本研究检查了与这一诊断转变相关的实证证据,并旨在确定慢性局部原发性疼痛(慢性原发性背痛[CBP])患者和慢性广泛性原发性疼痛(纤维肌痛综合征)患者的基本感觉-临床疼痛表型。通过描述性统计、相关性、主成分和潜在类别分析,通过逐步数据减少,对 185 名以前患有 CBP 和纤维肌痛综合征的患者的综合感觉-临床疼痛表型进行了推导。通过线性判别分析对聚类进行了交叉验证。确定了 4 组患者,需要 4 个压力疼痛敏感性标志物(敏感和对照压痛点数、疼痛强度和斜方肌的压痛阈值)和 2 个临床疼痛特征(疼痛区域和现有疼痛强度)。随后的判别分析表明,压力敏感性标志物的 3 个判别函数足以区分聚类。这些感觉-临床表型在躯体症状和障碍方面存在差异,但在精神病理学或心理社会因素方面没有差异。结果强调了在慢性原发性疼痛综合征中,感觉测试与临床疼痛评估相结合的重要性。