Sivakumar S P, Venkatadass K, Rajasekaran S
Ganga Hospital, Coimbatore, India.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jul;11(Suppl 4):S553-S556. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.04.029. Epub 2020 May 5.
To determine the preferred practices in the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) among members of the Paediatric Orthopaedic Society of India (POSI).
A questionnaire with 16 vignettes was made about SCFE and sent to all members of the Paediatric Orthopaedic Society of India (POSI) to study the similarity and variation in the management of SCFE. Specifically, respondents were asked about the role of reduction, methods of fixation, prophylactic fixation of the non-affected hip, postoperative management and their view on the prevalence of Femoro Acetabular Impingement (FAI) and anticipated need for secondary surgery.
The response rate was 94 out of 203 members of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons of India (51.9%). 62 out of 94 (66%) participating surgeons had an exclusive paediatric orthopaedics workload, with 61 surgeons (65%) having more than ten years of experience. Seventy-eight surgeons (83%) were most consistent in their advice for the management of stable slips based on severity. For severe stable slips, 67 surgeons (71%) recommended Modified Dunn procedure. Around 23% of the respondents preferred to do modified Dunn's procedure for all unstable slips while the rest had different approaches to treat this. Single Partially threaded cancellous screw is the preferred implant for in-situ fixation, while a single screw and K wire construct is the preferred construct for in Modified Dunn's procedure. Only 17(16%) of the responders do prophylactic pinning of the opposite hip regularly. Almost 90 responders (96%) do counsel parents about FAI in later stages of life.
Our study documents that about 70% of the practising paediatric orthopaedic surgeons prefer to do capital realignment procedure for severe stable slips. The treatment of unstable slips remains controversial without any consensus though about 70% believe that there is a role of gentle reduction or positional reduction or skeletal traction. About 50% of the respondents treat less than five slips a year and thus would not possible to generate high-quality evidence based on meagre numbers. This clearly shows that there is a need for developing a national SCFE registry to pool in all data which would help us to arrive at meaningful conclusions to arrive at the ideal management guidelines for SCFE.
确定印度小儿骨科学会(POSI)成员在治疗股骨头骨骺滑脱(SCFE)方面的首选方法。
制作了一份包含16个病例的关于SCFE的问卷,并发送给印度小儿骨科学会(POSI)的所有成员,以研究SCFE治疗方法的异同。具体而言,询问了受访者关于复位的作用、固定方法、未受影响髋关节的预防性固定、术后管理以及他们对股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)患病率和二次手术预期需求的看法。
印度小儿骨外科医生协会203名成员中有94人回复(51.9%)。94名参与调查的外科医生中有62人(66%)仅从事小儿骨科工作,61名外科医生(65%)有超过十年的经验。78名外科医生(83%)在根据严重程度管理稳定滑脱的建议上最为一致。对于严重稳定滑脱,67名外科医生(71%)推荐改良邓恩手术。约23%的受访者倾向于对所有不稳定滑脱都采用改良邓恩手术,其余受访者则有不同的治疗方法。单枚部分螺纹松质骨螺钉是原位固定的首选植入物,而单枚螺钉和克氏针组合是改良邓恩手术中的首选固定方式。只有17名(16%)受访者定期对另一侧髋关节进行预防性穿针固定。几乎90名受访者(96%)会向家长咨询后期生活中发生FAI的情况。
我们的研究记录显示,约70%的执业小儿骨科医生倾向于对严重稳定滑脱进行股骨头复位手术。不稳定滑脱的治疗仍存在争议,未达成任何共识,不过约70%的人认为轻柔复位、体位复位或骨骼牵引有作用。约50%的受访者每年治疗的滑脱病例少于5例,因此基于少量病例不可能产生高质量证据。这清楚地表明,需要建立一个全国性的SCFE登记处来汇总所有数据,这将有助于我们得出有意义的结论,从而制定出SCFE的理想管理指南。