使用轨道式外固定器治疗胫骨复杂骨不连
Management of complex non union of tibia using rail external fixator.
作者信息
Jilani Latif Zafar, Shaan Ziaul Hoda, Ranjan Rajesh, Faizan Mohd, Ahmad Sohail, Asif Naiyer
机构信息
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, UP, 202002, India.
出版信息
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jul;11(Suppl 4):S578-S584. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.12.016. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
INTRODUCTION
Management of the complex non union of tibia is a challenging task due to infection, bony gap, deformity, poor bone quality and poor soft tissue cover at fracture site. The limb reconstruction system (LRS) or Rail fixator has emerged as a viable option for the treatment of the same as it can address most of all above problems. It is more patient friendly and easier to apply in comparison to Ilizarov ring fixator.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Twenty two patients (17 males and 5 females) with complex non union of tibia underwent thorough debridement and resection of non viable bone followed by bone transport to fill the gap and then lengthening (8 patients) or acute docking & lengthening (14 patients) by the use of rail fixator. The average time to union, bone gap filled, lengthening achieved, treatment index were measured. The bone and functional outcome assessment was done by ASAMI score. The complications were classified according to Paley's classification.
RESULTS
Union without residual infection was achieved in 20 (90.1%) patients while 2 patients had failure. As per ASAMI criteria bone results were excellent in 12 (54.5%), good in 5 (22.7%), fair in 3 (13.6%) and poor in 2 (9.1%). Functional results were excellent in 11 (50%), good in 5 (22.72%), fair in 4 (18.18%) and failure in 2 (9%). Mean treatment duration was 8.2 months (range 7-19 months). Mean follow up duration was 11.3 months (range - 8.3 to 22 months). Average lengthening achieved was 4 cm (0-9 cm). Treatment index was 2.1 month/cm.
CONCLUSION
The monolateral rail fixator is simple, effective, easier to apply and more patient compliant with acceptable functional and radiological outcome.
引言
由于感染、骨缺损、畸形、骨质量差以及骨折部位软组织覆盖不良等因素,复杂胫骨骨不连的治疗是一项具有挑战性的任务。肢体重建系统(LRS)或轨道固定器已成为治疗此类疾病的可行选择,因为它可以解决上述大多数问题。与伊利扎洛夫环形固定器相比,它对患者更友好,应用起来也更容易。
材料与方法
22例复杂胫骨骨不连患者(17例男性,5例女性)接受了彻底清创和切除无活力骨,随后进行骨搬运以填补骨缺损,然后使用轨道固定器进行延长(8例患者)或急性对接与延长(14例患者)。测量了平均愈合时间、填补的骨缺损、实现的延长长度、治疗指数。通过ASAMI评分进行骨和功能结果评估。并发症根据佩利分类法进行分类。
结果
20例(90.1%)患者实现了无残留感染的愈合,2例患者治疗失败。根据ASAMI标准,骨结果优秀的有12例(54.5%),良好的有5例(22.7%),中等的有3例(13.6%),差的有2例(9.1%)。功能结果优秀的有11例(50%),良好的有5例(22.72%),中等的有4例(18.18%),失败的有2例(9%)。平均治疗持续时间为8.2个月(范围7 - 19个月)。平均随访持续时间为11.3个月(范围8.3 - 22个月)。平均延长长度为4厘米(0 - 9厘米)。治疗指数为2.1月/厘米。
结论
单侧轨道固定器简单、有效,应用更容易,患者依从性更好,功能和影像学结果可接受。