Suppr超能文献

床边血气分析仪与实验室自动分析仪测定肾病高钾血症患者血钾浓度的方法比较研究。

A method comparison study of a point-of-care blood gas analyser with a laboratory auto-analyser for the determination of potassium concentrations during hyperkalaemia in patients with kidney disease.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Division of Chemical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS), Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2020 Oct 15;30(3):030702. doi: 10.11613/BM.2020.030702. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hyperkalaemia is a common electrolyte disorder that may cause life-threatening cardiac arrythmias. We aimed to determine the agreement of potassium concentrations between GEM premier 3500 point-of-care blood gas analyser (POC-BGA) and Roche Cobas 6000 c501 auto-analyser in patients with hyperkalaemia.

METHODS

A prospective, cross-sectional study of all consecutive adult patients referred to the Renal Unit with a serum potassium concentration ≥ 5.5 mmol/L was performed. A total of 59 paired venous blood samples were included in the final statistical analysis. Passing-Bablok regression and Bland Altman analysis were used to compare the two methods.

RESULTS

The median laboratory auto-analyser potassium concentration was 6.1 (5.9-7.1) mmol/L as compared to the POC-BGA potassium concentration of 5.7 (5.5-6.8) mmol/L with a mean difference of - 0.43 mmol/L and 95% upper and lower limits of agreement of 0.35 mmol/L and - 1.21 mmol/L, respectively. Regression analysis revealed proportional systematic error. Test for linearity did not indicate significant deviation (P = 0.297).

CONCLUSION

Although regression analysis indicated proportional systematic error, on Bland Altman analysis, the mean difference appeared to remain relatively constant across the potassium range that was evaluated. Therefore, in patients presenting to the emergency department with a clinical suspicion of hyperkalaemia, POC-BGA potassium concentrations may be considered a surrogate for laboratory auto-analyser measurements once clinicians have been cautioned about this difference.

摘要

介绍

高钾血症是一种常见的电解质紊乱,可能导致危及生命的心律失常。我们旨在确定在高钾血症患者中,GEM premier 3500 点护理血气分析仪(POC-BGA)和罗氏 Cobas 6000 c501 自动分析仪的钾浓度之间的一致性。

方法

对所有连续就诊于肾脏科且血清钾浓度≥5.5mmol/L的成年患者进行前瞻性、横断面研究。最终统计分析中包括了 59 对静脉血样本。采用 Passing-Bablok 回归和 Bland Altman 分析来比较两种方法。

结果

实验室自动分析仪的钾浓度中位数为 6.1(5.9-7.1)mmol/L,而 POC-BGA 的钾浓度为 5.7(5.5-6.8)mmol/L,平均差值为-0.43mmol/L,95%一致性界限的上下限分别为 0.35mmol/L 和-1.21mmol/L。回归分析显示存在比例系统性误差。线性检验表明无显著偏差(P=0.297)。

结论

尽管回归分析表明存在比例系统性误差,但在 Bland Altman 分析中,在评估的钾范围内,平均差值似乎保持相对恒定。因此,在急诊科出现高钾血症临床怀疑的患者中,一旦医生注意到这种差异,POC-BGA 钾浓度可被视为实验室自动分析仪测量的替代值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5dfb/7394258/2eeda592f0ab/bm-30-3-030702-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验