Suppr超能文献

用于人工尿道括约肌初次植入的阴茎阴囊切口

Penoscrotal Incision for the Primary Implantation of an Artificial Urinary Sphincter.

作者信息

Jamaer Caroline, De Bruyn Helene, Van Renterghem Alexander, Baten Evert, Van Renterghem Koenraad

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Urology, Clinic for Urology, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.

出版信息

Curr Urol. 2020 Jun;14(2):74-78. doi: 10.1159/000499256. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) has become the gold standard to treat severe stress urinary incontinence in men. The traditional placement of an AUS requires 2 incisions. The cuff is placed through a perineal incision and the reservoir and pump are placed via an inguinal incision. The implantation of an AUS is also possible via a single penoscrotal approach.

OBJECTIVES

The objective is to demonstrate that the penoscrotal approach is not inferior to the perineal approach.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a single surgeon database from 2014 to 2019 was performed. A total of 40 patients have undergone implantation of an AUS via a penoscrotal incision. The outcome of patients was followed for an average of 31.3 months for adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

A primary American Medical Systems 800 sphincter was placed in 40 patients via a penoscrotal incision. The average age was 72 years. The average operating time was 35 minutes. The average cuff size was 4 cm. There were no infections of the prothesis so far. Three patients required a revision, 2 other patients needed an explant of the AUS, 1 patient underwent a cystectomy because of persistent radiocystitis. After activation of the sphincter, 33 patients (82.5%) were completely dry or using 1 pad per day for accidents. The remainder were all improved.

CONCLUSIONS

AUS implantation via a single penoscrotal approach is not inferior to the perineal approach and has several advantages. The operating time is shorter and the procedure requires only 1 incision which both reduce the risk of infections, while the continence results are similar for both approaches.

摘要

背景

人工尿道括约肌(AUS)已成为治疗男性严重压力性尿失禁的金标准。传统的AUS植入需要两个切口。袖带通过会阴切口放置,储液器和泵通过腹股沟切口放置。AUS也可以通过单一的阴茎阴囊入路植入。

目的

目的是证明阴茎阴囊入路不劣于会阴入路。

方法

对2014年至2019年一位外科医生的数据库进行回顾性分析。共有40例患者通过阴茎阴囊切口植入了AUS。对患者的结果进行了平均31.3个月的随访,以观察不良后果。

结果

40例患者通过阴茎阴囊切口植入了美国美敦力公司800型初级括约肌。平均年龄为72岁。平均手术时间为35分钟。平均袖带尺寸为4厘米。到目前为止,没有假体感染的情况。3例患者需要翻修,另外2例患者需要取出AUS,1例患者因持续性放射性膀胱炎接受了膀胱切除术。激活括约肌后,33例患者(82.5%)完全干爽或每天因失禁使用1片尿垫。其余患者均有改善。

结论

通过单一阴茎阴囊入路植入AUS不劣于会阴入路,且有几个优点。手术时间较短,该手术只需要一个切口,这都降低了感染风险,而两种入路的控尿效果相似。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验