Bernstein Michael H, Locher Cosima, Kube Tobias, Buergler Sarah, Stewart-Ferrer Sif, Blease Charlotte
Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 22;11:1354. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01354. eCollection 2020.
Research in social psychology demonstrates that physical environmental factors - or "artifacts" such as provider clothing and office décor - can influence health outcomes. However, the role of artifacts in augmenting or diminishing health outcomes is under-explored in the burgeoning discipline of placebo studies. In this paper, we argue that a careful consideration of artifacts may carry significant potential in informing how placebo effects can be maximized, and nocebo effects minimized in clinical settings. We discuss the potential mechanisms, including classical conditioning, response expectancy, and mindsets, by which artifacts might enhance or diminish these effects. Next, we propose testable hypotheses to investigate how placebo and nocebo effects might be elicited by artifacts in care settings, and conclude by providing innovative research designs to advance this novel research agendum.
社会心理学研究表明,物理环境因素——或诸如医护人员着装和办公室装饰等“人造物品”——会影响健康结果。然而,在新兴的安慰剂研究领域,人造物品在增强或削弱健康结果方面的作用尚未得到充分探索。在本文中,我们认为,仔细考虑人造物品可能在告知如何在临床环境中最大化安慰剂效应以及最小化反安慰剂效应方面具有巨大潜力。我们讨论了人造物品可能增强或削弱这些效应的潜在机制,包括经典条件作用、反应预期和心态。接下来,我们提出了可检验的假设,以研究在护理环境中人造物品如何引发安慰剂和反安慰剂效应,并通过提供创新的研究设计来推进这一新颖的研究议程作为结论。