Rossettini Giacomo, Carlino Elisa, Testa Marco
Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona. Via Magliotto, 2, 17100, Savona, Italy.
Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jan 22;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-1943-8.
Placebo and nocebo effects are embodied psycho-neurobiological responses capable of modulating pain and producing changes at different neurobiological, body at perceptual and cognitive levels. These modifications are triggered by different contextual factors (CFs) presented in the therapeutic encounter between patient and healthcare providers, such as healing rituals and signs. The CFs directly impact on the quality of the therapeutic outcome: a positive context, that is a context characterized by the presence of positive CFs, can reduce pain by producing placebo effects, while a negative context, characterized by the presence of negative CFs, can aggravate pain by creating nocebo effects. Despite the increasing interest about this topic; the detailed study of CFs as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects is still lacked in the management of musculoskeletal pain.Increasing evidence suggest a relevant role of CFs in musculoskeletal pain management. CFs are a complex sets of internal, external or relational elements encompassing: patient's expectation, history, baseline characteristics; clinician's behavior, belief, verbal suggestions and therapeutic touch; positive therapeutic encounter, patient-centered approach and social learning; overt therapy, posology of intervention, modality of treatment administration; marketing features of treatment and health care setting. Different explanatory models such as classical conditioning and expectancy can explain how CFs trigger placebo and nocebo effects. CFs act through specific neural networks and neurotransmitters that were described as mediators of placebo and nocebo effects.Available findings suggest a relevant clinical role and impact of CFs. They should be integrated in the clinical reasoning to increase the number of treatment solutions, boosts their efficacy and improve the quality of the decision-making. From a clinical perspective, the mindful manipulation of CFs represents a useful opportunity to enrich a well-established therapy in therapeutic setting within the ethical border. From a translational perspective, there is a strong need of research studies on CFs close to routine and real-world clinical practice in order to underline the uncertainty of therapy action and help clinicians to implement knowledge in daily practice.
安慰剂和反安慰剂效应是体现为心理-神经生物学的反应,能够调节疼痛,并在不同的神经生物学、身体感知和认知水平上产生变化。这些改变是由患者与医疗服务提供者治疗接触中呈现的不同情境因素(CFs)触发的,例如治疗仪式和体征。情境因素直接影响治疗结果的质量:积极情境,即具有积极情境因素的情境,可通过产生安慰剂效应减轻疼痛,而消极情境,即具有消极情境因素的情境,则可通过产生反安慰剂效应加重疼痛。尽管对该主题的兴趣日益增加,但在肌肉骨骼疼痛管理中,仍缺乏对作为安慰剂和反安慰剂效应触发因素的情境因素的详细研究。越来越多的证据表明情境因素在肌肉骨骼疼痛管理中具有重要作用。情境因素是一组复杂的内部、外部或关系要素,包括:患者的期望、病史、基线特征;临床医生的行为、信念、言语暗示和治疗性触摸;积极的治疗接触、以患者为中心的方法和社会学习;公开治疗、干预剂量、治疗给药方式;治疗的营销特点和医疗保健环境。不同的解释模型,如经典条件作用和期望,可以解释情境因素如何触发安慰剂和反安慰剂效应。情境因素通过被描述为安慰剂和反安慰剂效应介质的特定神经网络和神经递质起作用。现有研究结果表明情境因素具有重要的临床作用和影响。它们应整合到临床推理中,以增加治疗方案的数量,提高其疗效并改善决策质量。从临床角度来看,审慎地操控情境因素是在符合伦理边界的治疗环境中丰富既定疗法的一个有用机会。从转化医学角度来看,迫切需要开展接近常规和真实世界临床实践的情境因素研究,以强调治疗作用的不确定性,并帮助临床医生在日常实践中应用相关知识。