Expertise Center Movement Disorders Groningen, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, NL.
Department of rehabilitation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, NL.
Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2020 Jun 8;10:2. doi: 10.5334/tohm.69.
To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus (GPi-DBS) in dystonia on pre-operatively set functional priorities in daily living.
Fifteen pediatric and adult dystonia patients (8 male; median age 32y, range 8-65) receiving GPi-DBS were recruited. All patients underwent a multidisciplinary evaluation before and 1-year post DBS implantation. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) first identified and then measured changes in functional priorities. The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) was used to evaluate dystonia severity.
Priorities in daily functioning substantially varied between patients but showed significant improvements on performance and satisfaction after DBS. Clinically significant COPM-score improvements were present in 7/8 motor responders, but also in 4/7 motor non-responders.
The use of a patient-oriented approach to measure GPi-DBS effectiveness in dystonia provides an unique insight in patients' priorities and demonstrates that tangible improvements can be achieved irrespective of motor response.
Functional priorities in life of dystonia patients and their caregivers vary greatlyThe effect of DBS on functional priorities did not correlate with motor outcomeHalf of the motor 'non-responder' patients reported important changes in their prioritiesThe effect of DBS in dystonia should not be measured by motor outcome alone.
系统评估深部脑刺激苍白球 internus (GPi-DBS) 在术前设定的日常生活中功能优先级对肌张力障碍的疗效。
招募了 15 名接受 GPi-DBS 的儿科和成人肌张力障碍患者(8 名男性;中位年龄 32 岁,范围 8-65 岁)。所有患者在 DBS 植入前和植入后 1 年均接受了多学科评估。加拿大职业表现测量 (COPM) 首先确定,然后测量功能优先级的变化。 Burke-Fahn-Marsden 肌张力障碍评定量表 (BFMDRS) 用于评估肌张力障碍的严重程度。
日常生活中的功能优先级在患者之间差异很大,但 DBS 后在表现和满意度方面有显著改善。7/8 名运动应答者的 COPM 评分有显著改善,但 4/7 名运动无应答者也有显著改善。
使用以患者为中心的方法来衡量 GPi-DBS 在肌张力障碍中的疗效,为患者的优先级提供了独特的见解,并表明无论运动反应如何,都可以实现切实的改善。
肌张力障碍患者及其照顾者的生活功能优先级差异很大DBS 对功能优先级的影响与运动结果无关一半的运动“无应答者”患者报告他们的优先级有重要变化DBS 在肌张力障碍中的疗效不应仅通过运动结果来衡量。