Department of Sociology and Criminology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
Aggress Behav. 2021 Jan;47(1):99-110. doi: 10.1002/ab.21921. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
We examine the implication of adversary effects for target choice, lethal intent, and the use of weapons and allies in violent incidents. Adversary effects refer to the tendency of offenders to make tactical decisions based on the coercive power of victims and potential victims. Using the victim's gender as a proxy for coercive power, we analyzed violent incidents from the National Incident-Based Reporting System (2005-2014). The sample included over six million assaults, robberies, and homicides. Consistent with adversary effects, offenders who attack males (vs. females) are more likely to (a) kill victims; (b) use guns, knives, blunt objects, poison, and automobiles; (c) use male (but not female) allies; and (d) use multiple allies. The evidence for target choice is mixed: unarmed female offenders, but not unarmed male offenders, are more likely to target females than males. The evidence shows how a simple theoretical principle can parsimoniously account for basic patterns of violence in society related to gender, weapons, and group violence.
我们研究了对手效应在目标选择、致死意图以及在暴力事件中使用武器和盟友方面的含义。对手效应是指犯罪者根据受害者和潜在受害者的强制力做出战术决策的倾向。我们使用受害者的性别作为强制力的代理变量,分析了国家基于事件的报告系统(2005-2014 年)中的暴力事件。样本包括超过六百万起袭击、抢劫和杀人事件。与对手效应一致,攻击男性(而非女性)的犯罪者更有可能:(a)杀害受害者;(b)使用枪支、刀具、钝器、毒药和汽车;(c)使用男性(而非女性)盟友;(d)使用多个盟友。目标选择的证据是混合的:无武装的女性犯罪者,而不是无武装的男性犯罪者,更有可能攻击女性而不是男性。这一证据表明,一个简单的理论原则如何能够简洁地解释与性别、武器和群体暴力有关的社会中基本的暴力模式。