National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2020 Oct;17(10):480-494. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2020.1798452. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
In the event of a chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) hazard release, emergency responders rely on respiratory protection to prevent inhalation of these hazards. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) CBRN Statement of Standard calls for CBRN respirator canisters to be challenged with 11 different chemical test representative agents (TRAs) during certification testing, which represent hazards from 7 distinct Chemical Families; these 11 TRAs were identified during the original 2001 CBRN hazard assessment. CBRN hazards are constantly evolving in type, intent of use, and ways of dissemination. Thus, new and emerging hazards must be identified to ensure CBRN canisters continue to provide protection to emergency responders against all hazards that would most likely be used in an intentional or unintentional event. The objectives are to: (1) update the CBRN list of hazards to ensure NIOSH-approved CBRN canisters continue to provide adequate protection capabilities from newly emerging chemical and radiological hazards and (2) identify the need to update NIOSH TRAs to ensure testing conditions represent relevant hazards. These objectives were accomplished by reviewing recent hazard assessments to identify a list of chemical and radiological respiratory hazards, evaluate chemical/physical properties and filtration behavior for these hazards, group the hazards based on NIOSH's current Chemical Families, and finally compare the hazards to the current TRAs based on anticipated filtration behavior, among other criteria. Upon completion of the evaluation process, 237 hazards were identified and compared to NIOSH's current CBRN TRAs. Of these 237 hazards, 203 were able to be categorized into one of NIOSH's current seven Chemical Families. Five were identified for further evaluation. Based on reviewing key chemical/physical properties of each hazard, NIOSH's current 11 TRAs remain representative of the identified respiratory CBRN hazards to emergency responders and should continue to be used during NIOSH certification testing. Thus, NIOSH's CBRN Statement of Standard remains unchanged. The process developed standardizes a methodology for future hazard evaluations.
在化学、生物、放射性或核(CBRN)危害释放的情况下,应急响应人员依靠呼吸保护来防止吸入这些危害物。美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)的 CBRN 声明标准要求 CBRN 呼吸器罐在认证测试中用 11 种不同的化学测试代表性试剂(TRA)进行挑战,这些试剂代表来自 7 种不同化学家族的危害物;这些 11 种 TRA 是在 2001 年的原始 CBRN 危害评估中确定的。CBRN 危害物在类型、使用意图和传播方式上不断演变。因此,必须确定新出现的危害物,以确保 CBRN 罐继续为应急响应人员提供针对所有最有可能在有意或无意事件中使用的危害物的保护。目标是:(1)更新 CBRN 危害物清单,以确保 NIOSH 批准的 CBRN 罐继续提供足够的保护能力,防止新出现的化学和放射性危害物;(2)确定更新 NIOSH TRA 的需求,以确保测试条件代表相关危害物。这些目标是通过审查最近的危害评估来实现的,以确定化学和放射性呼吸危害物的清单,评估这些危害物的化学/物理特性和过滤行为,根据 NIOSH 当前的化学家族对危害物进行分组,最后根据预期的过滤行为等标准将危害物与当前的 TRA 进行比较。在完成评估过程后,共确定了 237 种危害物,并将其与 NIOSH 目前的 CBRN TRA 进行了比较。在这 237 种危害物中,有 203 种能够归入 NIOSH 目前的七种化学家族之一。有 5 种需要进一步评估。基于对每种危害物的关键化学/物理特性的审查,NIOSH 的当前 11 种 TRA 仍然代表了应急响应人员的呼吸 CBRN 危害物,并且应继续在 NIOSH 认证测试中使用。因此,NIOSH 的 CBRN 声明标准保持不变。所开发的流程使未来危害评估的方法标准化。