Suppr超能文献

过滤式口罩和罐/盒式过滤元件的纳米颗粒过滤性能。

Nanoparticle filtration performance of filtering facepiece respirators and canister/cartridge filters.

机构信息

National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Hyg. 2013;10(9):519-25. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.818229.

Abstract

Respiratory protection offered by a particulate respirator is a function of the filter efficiency and face seal leakage. A previous study in our laboratory measured the filter penetration and total inward leakage (TIL) of 20-1000 nm size particles for N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) using a breathing manikin. The results showed relatively higher filter penetration and TIL value under different leak sizes and flow rates at the most penetrating particle size (MPPS), ∼45 nm for electrostatic FFRs,and ∼150 nm for the same FFRs after charge removal. This indicates an advantage of mechanical filters over electrostatic filters rated for similar filter efficiencies in providing respiratory protection in nanoparticle workplaces. To better understand the influence of the MPPS, the filtration performance of commonly used one N95 and one N100 FFR models, and four P100 canister/cartridge models were measured with monodisperse NaCl aerosols, and polydisperse NaCl aerosols employed in the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) certification test method. As expected, the polydisperse aerosol penetration was below 5% for the N95 FFR, and below 0.03% for the N100 FFR and P100 canister/cartridge filters. Monodisperse aerosol penetration results showed a MPPS of ∼40 nm for both the N95 and N100 FFRs. All four P100 canister/cartridge filters had a MPPS of ≥150 nm, similar to expectations for mechanical filters. The P100 canister/cartridge filters showed lower penetration values for different size nanoparticles than the N100 FFRs. The results indicate that a mechanical filter would offer a relatively higher filtration performance for nanoparticles than an electrostatic counterpart rated for the same filter efficiency. Overall, the results obtained in the study suggest that MPPS should be considered as a key factor in the development of respirator standards and recommendations for protection against nanoparticles.

摘要

颗粒物呼吸器提供的呼吸防护是过滤效率和面部密封泄漏的功能。我们实验室的一项先前研究使用呼吸模拟器测量了 N95 过滤式面罩呼吸器(FFR)对 20-1000nm 尺寸颗粒的过滤穿透率和总向内泄漏(TIL)。结果表明,在最大穿透粒径(MPPS)下,不同泄漏尺寸和流量下的过滤穿透率和 TIL 值相对较高,静电 FFR 约为 45nm,相同 FFR 去除电荷后约为 150nm。这表明在纳米颗粒工作场所提供呼吸防护方面,机械过滤器优于静电过滤器,即使在具有相似过滤效率的情况下也是如此。为了更好地理解 MPPS 的影响,使用单分散 NaCl 气溶胶和 NIOSH 认证测试方法中使用的多分散 NaCl 气溶胶测量了常用的一种 N95 和一种 N100 FFR 模型以及四种 P100 罐/盒式模型的过滤性能。正如预期的那样,多分散气溶胶的穿透率对于 N95 FFR 低于 5%,对于 N100 FFR 和 P100 罐/盒式过滤器低于 0.03%。单分散气溶胶穿透率结果表明,N95 和 N100 FFR 的 MPPS 均约为 40nm。四个 P100 罐/盒式过滤器的 MPPS 均≥150nm,与机械过滤器的预期一致。与 N100 FFR 相比,四种 P100 罐/盒式过滤器对不同尺寸的纳米颗粒的穿透率较低。结果表明,对于相同过滤效率的静电对应物,机械过滤器对纳米颗粒的过滤性能相对较高。总的来说,该研究的结果表明,MPPS 应该被视为制定呼吸器标准和针对纳米颗粒保护建议的关键因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验