Suppr超能文献

关注疼痛的临床获益评估考量:监管视角。

Considerations in the Assessment of Clinical Benefit with a Focus on Pain: a Regulatory Perspective.

机构信息

Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, 20993, MD, USA.

出版信息

Neurotherapeutics. 2020 Jul;17(3):770-773. doi: 10.1007/s13311-020-00906-6.

Abstract

In the USA, the regulatory standard for demonstration of efficacy of a drug is evidence of clinical benefit from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials. Understanding the natural history of disease and how treatment is expected to alter its course, and gathering input from relevant stakeholders, such as patients, caregivers, and clinicians, is essential to understand the best way to measure clinical benefit in a clinical trial. Though pain intensity has been the primary outcome measure in clinical trials for pain, an array of measures assessing clinical outcomes from multiple perspectives can allow for more comprehensive interpretation of how a treatment affects patients' lives. Careful consideration should be given to how pain affects the feeling and functioning of each distinct patient population and which outcome assessment, or combination of outcome assessments, may be necessary to provide a more comprehensive view of the patient experience. The early stages of medical product development are an important opportunity to engage with regulatory agencies to discuss potential approaches to clinical trial design and outcome measurement strategies.

摘要

在美国,药物疗效证明的监管标准是充分且良好对照临床试验中临床获益的证据。了解疾病的自然史以及治疗预期如何改变其进程,并从相关利益相关者(如患者、护理人员和临床医生)收集意见,对于理解如何在临床试验中衡量临床获益至关重要。尽管疼痛强度一直是疼痛临床试验的主要结果测量指标,但一系列从多个角度评估临床结果的措施可以更全面地解释治疗如何影响患者的生活。应仔细考虑疼痛如何影响每个不同患者群体的感觉和功能,以及哪种或哪种组合的结果评估可能需要提供更全面的患者体验视图。在药物产品开发的早期阶段,与监管机构进行接触,讨论潜在的临床试验设计和结果测量策略方法是一个重要机会。

相似文献

2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

5
Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales.疼痛:三种常用疼痛评定量表综述
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验