Shi Z R, Itzkowitz S H, Kim Y S
Gastrointestinal Research Lab, VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California 94121.
J Histochem Cytochem. 1988 Mar;36(3):317-22. doi: 10.1177/36.3.3278057.
We compared the streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate (SP) method of immunoperoxidase histochemistry to the unlabeled antibody (PAP) and avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) techniques in human colorectal carcinoma tissues stained with a monoclonal antibody for expression of carcinoembryonic antigen. Compared to the ABC and PAP method, the SP method produced stronger staining intensity and very low background staining. This was true when other antibody isotypes, other antibody species, other organs, and another tumor-associated antigen were used. Moreover, the SP procedure time could be reduced to one third that of the ABC or PAP methods without compromising accuracy, and the SP reagent is stable for several months. The chemical nature of the streptavidin molecule accounts, in large part, for the advantages of the SP method.
我们将免疫过氧化物酶组织化学的链霉亲和素-过氧化物酶复合物(SP)法与未标记抗体(PAP)法和抗生物素蛋白-生物素-过氧化物酶复合物(ABC)技术进行了比较,这些方法用于用人结肠癌组织中的一种单克隆抗体对癌胚抗原表达进行染色。与ABC法和PAP法相比,SP法产生的染色强度更强,背景染色非常低。当使用其他抗体同种型、其他抗体种类、其他器官以及另一种肿瘤相关抗原时也是如此。此外,SP程序时间可以缩短至ABC法或PAP法的三分之一,而不影响准确性,并且SP试剂可稳定保存数月。链霉亲和素分子的化学性质在很大程度上说明了SP法的优势。