Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kinki-Chuo Chest Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Oct;36(10):1667-1675. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1808781. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
In the phase 3 RELAY trial, ramucirumab/erlotinib demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) over placebo/erlotinib in patients with -mutated metastatic NSCLC (median PFS 19.4 versus 12.4 months; HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.46-0.76; < .0001). Safety was consistent with established profiles for ramucirumab and erlotinib in NSCLC. Here, we present patient-reported outcomes.
Patients received oral erlotinib (150 mg daily) plus intravenous ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo Q2W until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Patients completed the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) and EQ-5D questionnaires at baseline and every other cycle. Analyses included time to deterioration (TtD) for LCSS via Kaplan-Meier method and Cox models and changes from baseline using mixed-model repeated-measures regression analysis.
Overall patient compliance for LCSS and EQ-5D was >95%. TtD did not differ between treatment arms for LCSS Total Score (HR = 0.962, 95% CI = 0.690-1.343) and Average Symptom Burden Index (HR = 1.012, 95% CI = 0.732-1.400). TtD of individual LCSS items (appetite loss, fatigue, cough, shortness of breath, pain, symptom distress, difficulties with daily activities, quality of life) indicated no difference between arms; however, patient-reported blood in sputum was worse for ramucirumab/erlotinib (HR = 1.987, 95% CI = 1.206-3.275). Results of LCSS mean changes from baseline were consistent with TtD, indicating no significant differences between treatment arms except for blood in sputum. Mean changes from baseline in EQ-5D index score ( = .94) and visual analogue scale ( = .95) revealed no overall differences in health status between treatment arms.
Patients' overall quality of life and symptom burden did not differ with the addition of ramucirumab to erlotinib compared to placebo/erlotinib. These data support the clinical benefit of ramucirumab/erlotinib in untreated -mutated metastatic NSCLC.
在 3 期 RELAY 试验中,与安慰剂/厄洛替尼相比,雷莫芦单抗/厄洛替尼在 - 突变型转移性 NSCLC 患者中表现出更好的无进展生存期(PFS)(中位 PFS 19.4 个月 vs 12.4 个月;HR=0.59,95%CI=0.46-0.76; < 0.0001)。安全性与 NSCLC 中雷莫芦单抗和厄洛替尼的既定特征一致。在这里,我们介绍患者报告的结果。
患者接受口服厄洛替尼(每天 150mg)加静脉注射雷莫芦单抗(10mg/kg)或安慰剂,每 2 周 1 次,直至疾病进展或无法耐受毒性。患者在基线和每两个周期时完成肺癌症状量表(LCSS)和 EQ-5D 问卷。分析包括通过 Kaplan-Meier 方法和 Cox 模型进行 LCSS 的恶化时间(TtD)和使用混合模型重复测量回归分析从基线变化。
LCSS 和 EQ-5D 的总体患者依从性>95%。LCSS 总评分(HR=0.962,95%CI=0.690-1.343)和平均症状负担指数(HR=1.012,95%CI=0.732-1.400)治疗臂之间的 TtD 没有差异。LCSS 各个项目(食欲下降、疲劳、咳嗽、呼吸急促、疼痛、症状困扰、日常活动困难、生活质量)的 TtD 无差异;然而,报告痰中带血的患者接受雷莫芦单抗/厄洛替尼治疗的情况更糟(HR=1.987,95%CI=1.206-3.275)。LCSS 从基线的平均变化结果与 TtD 一致,表明除了痰中带血外,治疗臂之间没有显著差异。EQ-5D 指数评分( = 0.94)和视觉模拟评分( = 0.95)的从基线的平均变化表明,治疗臂之间的总体健康状况没有差异。
与安慰剂/厄洛替尼相比,雷莫芦单抗联合厄洛替尼治疗并未导致患者整体生活质量和症状负担的差异。这些数据支持雷莫芦单抗/厄洛替尼在未经治疗的 - 突变型转移性 NSCLC 中的临床获益。