The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Cancer Sci. 2020 Dec;111(12):4510-4525. doi: 10.1111/cas.14655. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
In the global phase III RELAY study, ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) to placebo plus erlotinib (PL + ERL) in untreated patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI]: 0.59 [0.46-0.76]). This prespecified analysis assessed RAM + ERL efficacy and safety in the RELAY subset enrolled in East Asia (Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong). Randomized (1:1) patients received oral ERL (150 mg/d) plus intravenous RAM (10 mg/kg) or PL Q2W. Primary endpoint was PFS (investigator-assessed). Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory endpoints included biomarker analyses and time to second progression (PFS2). Median PFS was 19.4 vs 12.5 mo for RAM + ERL (n = 166) vs PL + ERL (n = 170) (HR: 0.636 [0.485-0.833]; P = .0009). The 1-y PFS rate was 72.4% vs 52.2%, respectively. PFS benefit was consistent in most subgroups, including by EGFR mutation (Ex19del, Ex21.L858R). ORR and DCR were similar in both arms, but median DoR was longer with RAM + ERL. OS and PFS2 were immature at data cut-off (censoring rates, 81.2%-84.3% and 64.1%-70.5%, respectively). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were more frequent with RAM + ERL (70.7%) than PL + ERL (49.4%). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation were similar in both arms (RAM + ERL, 13.3%; PL + ERL, 12.9%), as were post-progression EGFR T790M mutation rates (43%; 50%). With superior PFS over PL + ERL and safety consistent with the overall RELAY population, RAM + ERL is a viable treatment option for EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC in East Asia.
在全球 III 期 RELAY 研究中,雷莫芦单抗联合厄洛替尼(RAM+ERL)在未经治疗的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变阳性转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中显示出优于安慰剂联合厄洛替尼(PL+ERL)的无进展生存期(PFS)(风险比(HR)[95%CI]:0.59[0.46-0.76])。这项预先设定的分析评估了 RELAY 亚组中入组的东亚(日本、中国台湾、韩国、中国香港)患者的 RAM+ERL 疗效和安全性。按 1:1 比例随机分配的患者接受口服厄洛替尼(150mg/d)联合静脉注射 RAM(10mg/kg)或 PL,每 2 周一次。主要终点为 PFS(研究者评估)。关键次要终点包括客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、缓解持续时间(DoR)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。探索性终点包括生物标志物分析和第二次进展时间(PFS2)。RAM+ERL(n=166)与 PL+ERL(n=170)的中位 PFS 分别为 19.4 个月和 12.5 个月(HR:0.636[0.485-0.833];P=0.0009)。1 年 PFS 率分别为 72.4%和 52.2%。在大多数亚组中均观察到 PFS 获益,包括 EGFR 突变(Ex19del,Ex21.L858R)。两组的 ORR 和 DCR 相似,但 RAM+ERL 的中位 DoR 更长。OS 和 PFS2 在数据截止时仍不成熟(截尾率分别为 81.2%-84.3%和 64.1%-70.5%)。RAM+ERL 组治疗相关不良事件发生率高于 PL+ERL 组(分别为 70.7%和 49.4%)。两组因不良事件导致停药的比例相似(RAM+ERL,13.3%;PL+ERL,12.9%),进展后 EGFR T790M 突变率也相似(43%;50%)。与 PL+ERL 相比,RAM+ERL 具有更好的 PFS,且安全性与整体 RELAY 人群一致,因此对于东亚的 EGFR 突变型转移性 NSCLC,RAM+ERL 是一种可行的治疗选择。