Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021 May;28(4):289-320. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1803583. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
To compare the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on depressive symptoms in people after stroke.
A literature search was performed through databases from January 2000 to August 2018: MEDLINE; CINAHL Plus; Scopus; Academic Search Complete; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; Scopus; and Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts. Search terms included depression, stroke, non-pharmacologic, and intervention.
We included randomized controlled trials comparing non-pharmacological interventions to controls for depressive symptoms in people after stroke. Of 1703 identified articles, 22 trials were included in narrative synthesis, of which 13 were eligible for meta-analysis.
Two reviewers extracted characteristics of participants, interventions, and results from all included trials.
Thirteen interventions were categorized into four types: complementary and alternative therapy (five trials, n=228), exercise (four trials, n=263), psychosocial therapy (two trials, n=216), and multifactorial therapy (two trials, n=358). Overall beneficial effects of non-pharmacological interventions on depressive symptoms were found both post-intervention (effect size [ES] = -0.24, 95% confidence Interval [CI]: -0.37 to -0.11, < 0.05) and at follow-up (ES = -0.22, CI: -0.36 to -0.07, < 0.05). We found individual beneficial effects for complementary and alternative therapy (ES = -0.29, CI: -0.55 to -0.02, < 0.05) and psychosocial therapy (ES = - 0.33, CI: -0.60 to -0.06, < 0.05) post-intervention.
Complementary and alternative therapy and psychosocial therapy appear to be promising strategies for improving post-stroke depression. Future studies target a personalized approach for people with specific conditions such as cognitive impairment.
比较非药物干预措施对脑卒中后患者抑郁症状的疗效。
检索 2000 年 1 月至 2018 年 8 月的数据库:MEDLINE;CINAHL Plus;Scopus;Academic Search Complete;Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库;Scopus;以及图书馆、信息科学和技术摘要。检索词包括抑郁、中风、非药物和干预。
我们纳入了比较非药物干预措施与脑卒中后患者对照组的随机对照试验,以评估抑郁症状。在 1703 篇确定的文章中,22 项试验进行了叙述性综合分析,其中 13 项符合荟萃分析条件。
两名评审员从所有纳入的试验中提取参与者、干预措施和结果的特征。
13 种干预措施分为四类:补充和替代疗法(五项试验,n=228)、运动(四项试验,n=263)、心理社会疗法(两项试验,n=216)和多因素疗法(两项试验,n=358)。非药物干预措施对抑郁症状的总体有益效果无论是在干预后(效应大小[ES]=-0.24,95%置信区间[CI]:-0.37 至-0.11,<0.05)还是随访时(ES=-0.22,CI:-0.36 至-0.07,<0.05)都得到了证实。我们发现补充和替代疗法(ES=-0.29,CI:-0.55 至-0.02,<0.05)和心理社会疗法(ES=-0.33,CI:-0.60 至-0.06,<0.05)在干预后具有个体的有益效果。
补充和替代疗法和心理社会疗法似乎是改善中风后抑郁的有希望的策略。未来的研究应针对具有特定条件(如认知障碍)的人群采用个性化方法。