• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微针单独治疗、微针联合5-氟尿嘧啶溶液治疗与5-氟尿嘧啶病灶内注射治疗跖疣的疗效比较。

The efficacy of microneedling alone vs its combination with 5-fluorouracil solution vs 5-fluorouracil intralesional injection in the treatment of plantar warts.

作者信息

Ghonemy Soheir, Ibrahim Ali Mahitab, Ebrahim Howyda Mohamed

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.

出版信息

Dermatol Ther. 2020 Nov;33(6):e14179. doi: 10.1111/dth.14179. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1111/dth.14179
PMID:32785986
Abstract

Intralesional 5-fluorouracil (IL5-FU) has been used off-label for warts treatment; however, its use was limited by intense pain. Combination treatment can offer a robust therapeutic effect. Was to assess the therapeutic efficacy, safety and tolerability of microneedling vs its combination with 5-FU solution vs IL5-FU in the treatment of plantar warts. Ninety patients with plantar warts were divided randomly into three groups each containing 30 patients. Group A received (intralesional 5-FU), group B (microneedling) while group C (microneedling and 5-FU solution). All groups received treatment for a maximum of six sessions 2 weeks apart. Complete response was observed in 86.7% of the warts treated with 5-FU and microneedling (group C) vs to 76.7% and 70% in group A and B, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = .36). A significant increase in the number of sessions (P = .01) and pain score (P = .001) were found among group A compared to groups B and C. Patient's satisfaction was higher in group C (P = .05). No recurrence was reported in all groups. Microneedling can be used as alternative or adjuvant therapeutic modality for plantar warts treatment and significantly associated with less pain. Combination group was superior compared to the others.

摘要

病灶内注射5-氟尿嘧啶(IL5-FU)已被用于疣治疗的非标签用途;然而,其使用受到剧烈疼痛的限制。联合治疗可提供强大的治疗效果。旨在评估微针治疗、微针联合5-FU溶液与IL5-FU治疗跖疣的疗效、安全性和耐受性。90例跖疣患者随机分为三组,每组30例。A组接受(病灶内注射5-FU),B组接受(微针治疗),而C组接受(微针和5-FU溶液)。所有组均接受治疗,最多6个疗程,间隔2周。接受5-FU和微针治疗(C组)的疣中,86.7%观察到完全缓解,而A组和B组分别为76.7%和70%,无统计学显著差异(P = 0.36)。与B组和C组相比,A组的疗程数(P = 0.01)和疼痛评分(P = 0.001)显著增加。C组患者满意度更高(P = 0.05)。所有组均未报告复发。微针可作为跖疣治疗的替代或辅助治疗方式,且与较少疼痛显著相关。联合组优于其他组。

相似文献

1
The efficacy of microneedling alone vs its combination with 5-fluorouracil solution vs 5-fluorouracil intralesional injection in the treatment of plantar warts.微针单独治疗、微针联合5-氟尿嘧啶溶液治疗与5-氟尿嘧啶病灶内注射治疗跖疣的疗效比较。
Dermatol Ther. 2020 Nov;33(6):e14179. doi: 10.1111/dth.14179. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
2
Intralesional bleomycin injection vs microneedling-assisted topical bleomycin spraying in treatment of plantar warts.局部注射博来霉素与微针辅助外用博来霉素喷涂治疗足底疣的比较。
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019 Feb;18(1):124-128. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12537. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
3
Combined therapy of plantar warts with topical bleomycin and microneedling: a comparative controlled study‏.局部注射博来霉素联合微针治疗跖疣的对比对照研究
J Dermatolog Treat. 2020 May;31(3):235-240. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1612837. Epub 2019 May 17.
4
Comparison of the efficacy of intralesional 5-fluorouracil/lidocaine/epinephrine injection with cryotherapy to treat common and palmoplantar warts: A randomized, controlled trial.比较瘤内注射 5-氟尿嘧啶/利多卡因/肾上腺素与冷冻疗法治疗寻常疣和跖疣的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Sep;35(9):e15726. doi: 10.1111/dth.15726. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
5
Intralesional zinc sulfate 2% vs intralesional vitamin D in plantar warts: A clinicodermoscopic study.2%硫酸锌皮损内注射与维生素D皮损内注射治疗跖疣的临床皮肤镜研究
Dermatol Ther. 2020 May;33(3):e13308. doi: 10.1111/dth.13308. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
6
Efficacy of intralesional methotrexate in the treatment of plantar warts.病灶内注射甲氨蝶呤治疗跖疣的疗效
Dermatol Ther. 2020 Mar;33(2):e13228. doi: 10.1111/dth.13228. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
7
To Compare Efficacy Between Cryotherapy And Mitomycin Microneedling For The Treatment Of Plantar Warts.比较冷冻疗法与丝裂霉素微针治疗跖疣的疗效。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2023 Feb-Mar;35(1):133-136. doi: 10.55519/JAMC-01-10932.
8
A comparative study of intralesional injection of antigen, bleomycin and 5-fluorouracil for treatment of plane warts.抗原、平阳霉素和 5-氟尿嘧啶局部注射治疗扁平疣的对比研究。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2021 Sep;32(6):663-668. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1688236. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
9
Treatment of common warts with an intralesional mixture of 5-fluorouracil, lidocaine, and epinephrine: a prospective placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized trial.采用5-氟尿嘧啶、利多卡因和肾上腺素瘤内注射混合物治疗寻常疣:一项前瞻性安慰剂对照双盲随机试验。
Dermatol Surg. 2008 May;34(5):656-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.34123.x. Epub 2008 Feb 6.
10
Therapeutic efficacy and safety of three different modalities in pediatric patients with plantar warts.三种不同方法治疗儿童足底疣的疗效和安全性。
Dermatol Ther. 2021 Sep;34(5):e15073. doi: 10.1111/dth.15073. Epub 2021 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Cryomicroneedle Arrays for Biotherapeutics Delivery.用于生物治疗药物递送的低温微针阵列
Small Sci. 2025 Jun 8;5(8):2500009. doi: 10.1002/smsc.202500009. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
AI-Driven Innovation in Skin Kinetics for Transdermal Drug Delivery: Overcoming Barriers and Enhancing Precision.用于透皮给药的皮肤动力学中的人工智能驱动创新:克服障碍并提高精准度。
Pharmaceutics. 2025 Feb 2;17(2):188. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17020188.
3
Intralesional combined digoxin and furosemide versus intralesional 5-flurouracil for the treatment of recalcitrant plantar warts: a prospective, randomized study.
局部联合地高辛和呋塞米与局部 5-氟尿嘧啶治疗难治性足底疣的前瞻性随机研究。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Jun 15;316(7):411. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-03014-z.
4
Systematic Review of Intralesional Therapies for Cutaneous Warts.皮肤疣病损内治疗的系统评价
JID Innov. 2024 Jan 24;4(3):100264. doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100264. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Transdermal drug delivery systems for fighting common viral infectious diseases.用于对抗常见病毒性传染病的经皮药物传递系统。
Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2021 Aug;11(4):1498-1508. doi: 10.1007/s13346-021-01004-6. Epub 2021 May 22.