• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国哈尔滨居民对城市固体废物处理满意度的影响因素。

The influencing factors of Harbin (China) residents' satisfaction with municipal solid waste treatment.

机构信息

The Economy and Management School, Harbin Engineering University, China.

School of Public Management, South China University of Technology, China.

出版信息

Waste Manag Res. 2021 Jan;39(1):83-92. doi: 10.1177/0734242X20947158. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1177/0734242X20947158
PMID:32787673
Abstract

China is experiencing an enormous increase in municipal household solid waste (MHSW) generation and is facing multiple problems associated with the treatment of MHSW. This paper analyses factors affecting residents' satisfaction with MHSW treatment performance. Six factors were identified by the Delphi method: (a) pick-up frequency by waste collection vehicles, (b) fund supply situation, (c) charging standard for waste treatment, (d) waste bin arrangement, (e) laws and regulations, (f) publicity and education. We examine the significance of these six influencing factors, estimating binary logistic regression models. Data for this study are derived from the survey responses of 469 households in Harbin, one of the largest cities in northeast China. The results indicate that 'pick-up frequency by waste collection vehicles' is ranked the first and most important determinant of Harbin residents' satisfaction with MHSW treatment; this is closely followed by 'publicity and education'. The third and fourth significant influencing factors, respectively, are 'fund supply situation' and 'charging standard for waste treatment'. The last two factors are 'laws and regulations' and 'waste bin arrangement'. By understanding the influence of various factors on residents' satisfaction, this study aims to help in designing an effective waste management system to reduce the cost of MHSW management, and to raise the residents' satisfaction with municipal solid waste treatment. Based on the research findings, we advocate that establishing a reasonable waste transport (pick-up) system as well as strengthening publicity and education of waste management are key to improving residents' satisfaction with the MHSW treatment performance.

摘要

中国的城市生活垃圾(Municipal Solid Waste,MHSW)产生量正在迅速增加,同时面临着与 MHSW 处理相关的多重问题。本文分析了影响居民对 MHSW 处理绩效满意度的因素。通过德尔菲法确定了六个因素:(a)垃圾收运车辆的清运频率,(b)资金供应情况,(c)垃圾处理收费标准,(d)垃圾桶设置,(e)法律法规,(f)宣传教育。我们检验了这六个影响因素的重要性,构建了二元逻辑回归模型。本研究的数据来自中国东北地区最大城市之一哈尔滨的 469 户家庭的调查响应。结果表明,“垃圾收运车辆的清运频率”是影响哈尔滨居民对 MHSW 处理满意度的首要和最重要因素;其次是“宣传教育”。第三和第四个重要影响因素分别是“资金供应情况”和“垃圾处理收费标准”。最后两个因素是“法律法规”和“垃圾桶设置”。通过了解各种因素对居民满意度的影响,本研究旨在帮助设计有效的垃圾管理系统,以降低 MHSW 管理成本,并提高居民对城市固体废物处理的满意度。基于研究结果,我们主张建立合理的垃圾运输(清运)系统以及加强垃圾管理的宣传教育是提高居民对 MHSW 处理绩效满意度的关键。

相似文献

1
The influencing factors of Harbin (China) residents' satisfaction with municipal solid waste treatment.中国哈尔滨居民对城市固体废物处理满意度的影响因素。
Waste Manag Res. 2021 Jan;39(1):83-92. doi: 10.1177/0734242X20947158. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
2
A factor analysis of residents' performance in municipal solid waste source-separated collection: A case study of pilot cities in China.居民在城市生活垃圾源头分类收集方面表现的因素分析:以中国试点城市为例。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2019 Aug;69(8):918-933. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2019.1596993. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
3
The potential value of recycling municipal household solid waste in Shanghai, China.中国上海城市生活垃圾回收利用的潜在价值。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2021 Mar;71(3):285-292. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2019.1705435.
4
Does the new municipal solid waste management regulation promote residents' waste separation behaviour? Evidence from survey data in Beijing, China.新的城市固体废物管理条例是否促进了居民的垃圾分类行为?来自中国北京调查数据的证据。
Waste Manag Res. 2024 Jul;42(7):556-568. doi: 10.1177/0734242X231197366. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
5
Influencing Factors on the Household-Waste-Classification Behavior of Urban Residents: A Case Study in Shanghai.影响城镇居民垃圾分类行为的因素:以上海市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 27;19(11):6528. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116528.
6
External Factors Impacting Residents' Participation in Waste Sorting Using NCA and fsQCA Methods on Pilot Cities in China.外部因素对中国试点城市居民参与垃圾分类的影响:基于 NCA 和 fsQCA 方法的研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054080.
7
An Analysis of the Factors behind Rural Residents' Satisfaction with Residential Waste Management in Jiangxi, China.中国江西农村居民对生活垃圾管理满意度的影响因素分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;19(21):14220. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114220.
8
Promoting Chinese urban residents' participation in source separation and recycling.促进中国城市居民参与源头分类和回收。
Waste Manag. 2022 Feb 15;139:290-299. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.032. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
9
Evolution of community residents' waste classification behavior based on multi-agent simulation.基于多主体模拟的社区居民垃圾分类行为演变。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2022 Dec;72(12):1398-1409. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2022.2108932. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
10
Predicting the implementation effect of the municipal solid waste mandatory classification policy based on the residents' behavior.基于居民行为预测城市生活垃圾强制分类政策的实施效果。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2020 Dec;70(12):1303-1313. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2020.1798826. Epub 2020 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
An Analysis of the Factors behind Rural Residents' Satisfaction with Residential Waste Management in Jiangxi, China.中国江西农村居民对生活垃圾管理满意度的影响因素分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;19(21):14220. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114220.
2
Government Trust, Environmental Pollution Perception, and Environmental Governance Satisfaction.政府信任、环境污染感知与环境治理满意度
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 11;19(16):9929. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169929.
3
Determinants of Satisfaction with Solid Waste Management Services: A Central-Local Comparison in China.
固体废物管理服务满意度的决定因素:中国的中央-地方比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 11;19(8):4610. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084610.