Suppr超能文献

原发性不孕女性早期补救卵胞浆内单精子注射与传统卵胞浆内单精子注射后妊娠的围产期和新生儿结局:一项为期6年的回顾性研究

Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies after early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection in women with primary infertility compared with conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a retrospective 6-year study.

作者信息

Xiong Feng, Sun Qing, Li Guangui, Yao Zhihong, Chen Peilin, Wan Caiyun, Zhong Huixian, Zeng Yong

机构信息

Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Immunology for Peri-implantation, Shenzhen Zhongshan Institute for Reproduction and Genetics, Fertility Center, Shenzhen Zhongshan Urology Hospital, Guangdong, 518045, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03155-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has been used in clinic as appropriate currently. While the outcomes of children born after this method were not well assessed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of early rescue ICSI on women with primary infertility.

METHODS

Fresh embryo transfer cycles after rescue (n = 214) and conventional (n = 546) ICSI were retrospectively evaluated from women with primary infertility who underwent their first assisted reproductive technology cycles at our center in 2012-2017. The conventional ICSI group was subdivided into ICSI-1 (semen suitable for in vitro fertilization, IVF) and ICSI-2 (poor semen quality) to minimize bias from differences in semen quality. Pregnancy, delivery and neonatal outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

There was a higher rate of polyspermy and a lower rate of top-quality embryos (TQE) on day 3 for oocytes subject to rescue ICSI compared with conventional ICSI. This reduced the total number of TQE and the number of TQE transferred in the rescue ICSI group. There was no significant difference between groups in clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, early miscarriage and live birth. For pregnant women, gestational age, route of delivery, risk of preterm birth and gestational diabetes mellitus were also comparable. Neonatal outcomes including sex ratio, birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit admission and birth defects were also similar after rescue and conventional ICSI. Moreover, no differences were observed with the different ICSI subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

For women with primary infertility who have a high risk of IVF fertilization failure (FF), rescue ICSI provides a safe and efficient alternative to minimize FF after initial IVF, but results in fewer TQE on day 3.

摘要

背景

早期补救性卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)目前已在临床上酌情使用。然而,通过这种方法出生的儿童的结局尚未得到充分评估。本研究的目的是评估早期补救性ICSI对原发性不孕妇女的影响。

方法

回顾性评估了2012年至2017年在本中心接受首次辅助生殖技术周期治疗的原发性不孕妇女在补救性(n = 214)和传统(n = 546)ICSI后的新鲜胚胎移植周期。将传统ICSI组细分为ICSI-1(精液适合体外受精,IVF)和ICSI-2(精液质量差),以尽量减少精液质量差异带来的偏差。比较了各组之间的妊娠、分娩和新生儿结局。

结果

与传统ICSI相比,接受补救性ICSI的卵母细胞在第3天出现多精受精的发生率更高,优质胚胎(TQE)的发生率更低。这减少了补救性ICSI组中TQE的总数和移植的TQE数量。各组之间在临床妊娠、持续妊娠、早期流产和活产方面没有显著差异。对于孕妇,孕周、分娩方式、早产风险和妊娠期糖尿病的风险也相当。补救性和传统ICSI后的新生儿结局,包括性别比例、出生体重、新生儿重症监护病房入院率和出生缺陷也相似。此外,不同的ICSI亚组之间未观察到差异。

结论

对于体外受精受精失败(FF)风险高的原发性不孕妇女,补救性ICSI提供了一种安全有效的替代方法,可在初次体外受精后尽量减少FF,但在第3天的TQE较少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/652b/7425156/ac0345317d4e/12884_2020_3155_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验