• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

控制大麻的使用以减轻娱乐性大麻使用者的相关伤害:德国的一项准实验研究。

Controlled administration of cannabis to mitigate cannabis-attributable harm among recreational users: a quasi-experimental study in Germany.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Centre for Interdisciplinary Addiction Research, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2020 Mar 23;9:201. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22612.2. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.22612.2
PMID:32789008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7400698/
Abstract

New approaches are required to slow down or reverse increasing trends of levels of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabis-attributable hospitalizations in Germany. Legal access to cannabis may constitute one viable effective policy response; however, available evidence does not suffice to inform a regulation model for Germany. The proposed study aims to reduce harm for cannabis users through legal access to herbal cannabis through pharmacies. A quasi-experimental study comparing cannabis users with legal access to herbal cannabis (Berlin, intervention group) to those without legal access (Hamburg, control group) (total N=698). As the primary outcome, we hypothesize that: 1) illegal THC consumption will reduce by at least 50% in the intervention group and 2) total THC exposure in the intervention group will be reduced by at least 10% lower than that of the control group, taking into account baseline values. Secondary outcomes comprise measures of frequency of use, THC-impaired driving, and mode of administration. Paired t-tests and multilevel regression models will be performed for statistical analyses. This study proposal is currently being reviewed by the 'Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices' - the body responsible for approving research studies on classified substances, including cannabis. Upon approval and prior to the start of the study, a full ethical review will be undertaken. Results may inform a regulation model for Germany and other jurisdictions and are expected to deepen the understanding of the effects of legal access to cannabis. German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS00020829.

摘要

需要新的方法来减缓或扭转德国 delta-9-四氢大麻酚 (THC) 水平和与大麻相关的住院治疗呈上升趋势的情况。合法获得大麻可能是一种可行的有效政策应对措施;然而,现有的证据不足以为德国的监管模式提供信息。拟议的研究旨在通过药房合法提供草药大麻来减少大麻使用者的伤害。一项比较有合法途径获取草药大麻的大麻使用者(柏林,干预组)和没有合法途径的大麻使用者(汉堡,对照组)(总 N=698)的准实验研究。作为主要结果,我们假设:1)干预组中非法 THC 消费将减少至少 50%,2)干预组的总 THC 暴露量将比对照组至少减少 10%,考虑到基线值。次要结果包括使用频率、THC 损害驾驶和给药方式的测量。将进行配对 t 检验和多层回归模型进行统计分析。 本研究提案目前正在由负责批准包括大麻在内的分类物质研究的“联邦药物和医疗器械研究所”进行审查。在获得批准并开始研究之前,将进行全面的伦理审查。研究结果可能为德国和其他司法管辖区的监管模式提供信息,并有望加深对合法获取大麻影响的理解。 德国临床试验注册处 (DRKS),DRKS00020829。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a87/7539076/e3c8abc6ef2f/f1000research-9-29088-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a87/7539076/e3c8abc6ef2f/f1000research-9-29088-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a87/7539076/e3c8abc6ef2f/f1000research-9-29088-g0000.jpg

相似文献

1
Controlled administration of cannabis to mitigate cannabis-attributable harm among recreational users: a quasi-experimental study in Germany.控制大麻的使用以减轻娱乐性大麻使用者的相关伤害:德国的一项准实验研究。
F1000Res. 2020 Mar 23;9:201. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22612.2. eCollection 2020.
2
Prevalence and correlates of medical cannabis patients' use of cannabis for recreational purposes.医用大麻患者将大麻用于娱乐目的的流行情况和相关因素。
Addict Behav. 2019 Jun;93:233-239. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
3
Dark Classics in Chemical Neuroscience: Δ-Tetrahydrocannabinol.化学神经科学中的黑暗经典:Δ-四氢大麻酚。
ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019 May 15;10(5):2160-2175. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00651. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
4
The legal status of cannabis (marijuana) and cannabidiol (CBD) under U.S. law.大麻( marijuana )和大麻二酚( CBD )在美国法律下的法律地位。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 May;70(Pt B):288-291. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.11.021. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
5
Mapping cannabis potency in medical and recreational programs in the United States.绘制美国医疗和娱乐用大麻效力图。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 26;15(3):e0230167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230167. eCollection 2020.
6
Cannabis for Chronic Pain: Challenges and Considerations.大麻治疗慢性疼痛:挑战与考量。
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Jun;38(6):651-662. doi: 10.1002/phar.2115. Epub 2018 May 16.
7
The medical use of cannabis for reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with HIV/AIDS.大麻在医学上用于降低艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者的发病率和死亡率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD005175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005175.pub3.
8
Marijuana use among patients with epilepsy at a tertiary care center.癫痫患者在三级护理中心使用大麻的情况。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Aug;97:144-148. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.05.037. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
9
Cannabis regulatory system in European Union countries, forensic concept of "doping dose" and medico-legal implications.欧盟国家的大麻监管体系、“兴奋剂剂量”的法医学概念及法医学影响
Med Leg J. 2023 Sep;91(3):128-135. doi: 10.1177/00258172231166272. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
10
Price elasticity of illegal versus legal cannabis: a behavioral economic substitutability analysis.非法与合法大麻的价格弹性:行为经济学替代分析。
Addiction. 2019 Jan;114(1):112-118. doi: 10.1111/add.14437. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Current state of cannabis use, policies, and research across sixteen countries: cross-country comparisons and international perspectives.十六个国家的大麻使用、政策和研究现状:跨国比较和国际视角。
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2022 Jul 14;44(Suppl 1):e20210263. doi: 10.47626/2237-6089-2021-0263.
2
Cannabis and public health: a global experiment without control.大麻与公共卫生:一场没有对照组的全球试验。
World Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;19(2):192-194. doi: 10.1002/wps.20740.