Begg Sara, Wright Alexandra, Small Graham, Mosha Franklin, Kirby Matthew, Snetselaar Janneke, Aziz Salum, Bharmal Jameel, Dacombe Russell, Bates Imelda
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Gates Open Res. 2020 Jun 12;4:59. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13133.1. eCollection 2020.
With increasing insecticide resistance in malaria-endemic countries there is an urgent need for safe and effective novel vector control products. To improve the capacity of facilities that test insecticides in sub-Saharan Africa, a programme is supporting seven facilities towards Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) certification, the globally recognized standard for quality management system (QMS) for the conduct of non-clinical and environmental studies. The World Health Organization (WHO) GLP Handbook provides guidance on a stepwise approach to implement a GLP compliant QMS. This study assesses auditor GLP checklists and timings outlined in the WHO GLP Handbook in the real-life context of a Tanzanian insecticide-testing facility, evaluating their implementation in this context. We conducted document review and semi-structured interviews with staff at all levels of the test facility to explore factors that influenced progress towards GLP certification. We found that while auditor GLP checklists underemphasised computer systems, they were otherwise broadly applicable. Factors that delayed time to completion of GLP certification included the need for extensive infrastructure improvements, the availability of regional expertise related to GLP, the capacity of national and regional external systems and services to meet GLP compliance requirements, and training development required for Standard Operating Procedure implementation. The standards required for full GLP compliance are rigorous, with an expected completion timeline to implementation of 24 months. This study shows that in low and middle-income countries this timeline may be unrealistic due to challenges related to infrastructure development and lack of regional capacity and expertise. We recommend a comprehensive gap analysis when starting a project, including these areas which are beyond those recommended by the WHO GLP Handbook. These challenges can be successfully overcome and the experience in Tanzania provides key lessons for other facilities seeking GLP certification or the development of similar QMS.
随着疟疾流行国家的杀虫剂耐药性不断增加,迫切需要安全有效的新型病媒控制产品。为提高撒哈拉以南非洲地区杀虫剂检测设施的能力,一个项目正在支持七个设施获得良好实验室规范(GLP)认证,这是全球认可的用于非临床和环境研究的质量管理体系(QMS)标准。世界卫生组织(WHO)的GLP手册提供了实施符合GLP的质量管理体系的逐步方法指南。本研究评估了WHO GLP手册中概述的审核员GLP检查表和时间安排,在坦桑尼亚一家杀虫剂检测设施的实际背景下进行评估,评估其在这种背景下的实施情况。我们对检测设施各级工作人员进行了文件审查和半结构化访谈,以探讨影响GLP认证进展的因素。我们发现,虽然审核员GLP检查表对计算机系统的重视不足,但在其他方面具有广泛适用性。延迟GLP认证完成时间的因素包括需要进行广泛的基础设施改进、与GLP相关的区域专业知识的可用性、国家和区域外部系统及服务满足GLP合规要求的能力,以及实施标准操作程序所需的培训开发。完全符合GLP的标准要求严格,预计实施完成时间为24个月。本研究表明,在低收入和中等收入国家,由于与基础设施发展以及缺乏区域能力和专业知识相关的挑战,这个时间线可能不现实。我们建议在启动项目时进行全面的差距分析,包括这些超出WHO GLP手册建议的领域。这些挑战可以成功克服,坦桑尼亚的经验为其他寻求GLP认证或开发类似质量管理体系的设施提供了关键经验教训。