Suppr超能文献

良好实验室规范要求与实验室认可计划的协调统一。

Harmonization of good laboratory practice requirements and laboratory accreditation programs.

作者信息

Royal P D

机构信息

Springborn Laboratories, Inc., Environmental Sciences Division, Wareham, Massachusetts 02571.

出版信息

Qual Assur. 1994 Sep;3(3):312-5.

PMID:7804653
Abstract

Efforts to harmonize Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) requirements have been underway through the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) since 1981. In 1985, a GLP panel was established to facilitate the practical implementation of the OECD/GLP program. Through the OECD/GLP program, Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) agreements which foster requirements for reciprocal data and study acceptance and unified GLP standards have been developed among member countries. Three OECD Consensus Workshops and three inspectors training workshops have been held. In concert with these efforts, several OECD countries have developed GLP accreditation programs, managed by local health and environmental ministries. In addition, Canada and the United States are investigating Laboratory Accreditation programs for environmental monitoring assessment and GLP-regulated studies. In the European Community (EC), the need for quality standards specifying requirements for production and international trade has promoted International Standards Organization (ISO) certification for certain products. ISO-9000 standards identify requirements for certification of quality systems. These certification programs may affect the trade and market of laboratories conducting GLP studies. Two goals identified by these efforts are common to both programs: first, harmonization and recognition of requirements, and second, confidence in the rigor of program components used to assess the integrity of data produced and study activities. This confidence can be promoted, in part, through laboratory inspection and screening processes. However, the question remains, will data produced by sanctioned laboratories be mutually accepted on an international basis?(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

自1981年以来,经济合作与发展组织(OECD)一直在努力协调良好实验室规范(GLP)要求。1985年,成立了一个GLP小组,以促进经合组织/GLP计划的实际实施。通过经合组织/GLP计划,成员国之间制定了谅解备忘录(MOU)协议,这些协议促进了对相互数据和研究认可以及统一GLP标准的要求。已经举办了三次经合组织共识研讨会和三次检查员培训研讨会。与此努力相一致,几个经合组织国家已经制定了由当地卫生和环境部管理的GLP认证计划。此外,加拿大和美国正在研究针对环境监测评估和GLP规范研究的实验室认证计划。在欧洲共同体(EC),对规定生产和国际贸易要求的质量标准的需求促进了某些产品的国际标准化组织(ISO)认证。ISO-9000标准确定了质量体系认证的要求。这些认证计划可能会影响进行GLP研究的实验室的贸易和市场。这些努力确定的两个目标在两个计划中是共同的:第一,要求的协调和认可;第二,对用于评估所产生数据的完整性和研究活动的计划组成部分的严格性的信心。这种信心可以部分通过实验室检查和筛选过程来促进。然而,问题仍然存在,经认可的实验室产生的数据在国际基础上会被相互接受吗?(摘要截短为250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验