Hota Salini, Parascandola Salvatore, Smith Savannah, Tampo Mayou Martin, Amdur Richard, Obias Vincent
Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, 825 Fairfax Ave Ste. 610, Norfolk, VA, 23507, USA.
Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4602-4608. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07885-x. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
Crohn's disease has historically been managed medically with sparing use of surgical resection. With the development of strictures or fistulas, surgical management such as an ileocecal resection may become necessary. Minimally invasive options such as laparoscopic and robotic-assisted techniques are alternatives to open surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of minimally invasive surgery for Crohn's disease.
We performed a retrospective review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database to select 5158 patients with Crohn's disease who underwent ileocecal resection (open, laparoscopic, or robotic-assisted). Preoperative, perioperative, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared between the groups using both univariate and multivariate logistical regression models. SAS was used for data analysis with p < 0.05 considered significant.
The three treatment groups (open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted ileocecal resection) had 30-day postoperative outcomes reported in NSQIP. The average BMI was 25 kg/m and the average age was 41. The rate of anastomotic leaks was significantly higher in the open surgery group compared to the minimally invasive groups (p = 0.001). The open surgery group had a significantly higher reoperation rate (p = 0.0002) and wound infection rate (p < 0.0001). The robotic-assisted group had significantly longer operative times compared to the laparoscopic and open groups (p < 0.0001).
The decision to operate on a patient with Crohn's disease involves selecting an approach based on patient factors, surgeon preference, and availability of equipment. When evaluating the short-term postoperative outcomes in patients that have undergone ileocecal resection for management of Crohn's, minimally invasive techniques have had a lower incidence of wound infections, anastomotic leaks, and re-intervention in carefully selected patients. This retrospective review of a large national database demonstrates the efficacy of minimally invasive techniques in managing Crohn's disease in selected patients.
克罗恩病在历史上一直采用药物治疗,手术切除使用较少。随着狭窄或瘘管的发展,可能需要进行手术治疗,如回盲部切除术。腹腔镜和机器人辅助技术等微创选择是开放手术的替代方案。本研究的目的是评估克罗恩病微创手术的安全性。
我们对国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库进行了回顾性分析,以选择5158例接受回盲部切除术(开放、腹腔镜或机器人辅助)的克罗恩病患者。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型比较各组术前、围手术期和术后30天的结果。使用SAS进行数据分析,p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
NSQIP报告了三个治疗组(开放、腹腔镜和机器人辅助回盲部切除术)术后30天的结果。平均体重指数为25kg/m,平均年龄为41岁。与微创组相比,开放手术组的吻合口漏发生率显著更高(p=0.001)。开放手术组的再次手术率(p=0.0002)和伤口感染率显著更高(p<0.0001)。与腹腔镜组和开放组相比,机器人辅助组的手术时间显著更长(p<0.0001)。
对克罗恩病患者进行手术的决策涉及根据患者因素、外科医生偏好和设备可用性选择手术方式。在评估因克罗恩病接受回盲部切除术患者的短期术后结果时,在精心挑选的患者中,微创技术的伤口感染、吻合口漏和再次干预发生率较低。对一个大型国家数据库的回顾性分析证明了微创技术在特定患者中治疗克罗恩病的有效性。