Department of Surgery, St John of God Hospital, Marschallgasse 12, 8020, Graz, Austria.
Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Congregation Hospital (Sisters of Mercy), Linz, Austria.
J Med Syst. 2020 Aug 13;44(9):168. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-01640-4.
With increasing economic pressure on health care, modern hospital management is focusing at industrial optimization techniques to improve efficiency while maintaining quality. Shop floor management, a technique of code-based, process-oriented guidance directly on site is a method of lean management intended to increase efficiency in the operating room. In the literature, there is only scant evidence that the introduction of this technique alone can increase efficiency. The aim of this retrospective study is to determine whether a single tool alone can significantly improve codes. We performed an empirical, retrospective analysis of a number of codes from 3800 operations during two periods of comparison: upon introduction of shop floor management, and one year thereafter. Data was extracted from the Hospital Information System and transferred to a database. There was no statistically significant change in the relevant codes chosen, whether specific to the operating room (turnover time, first patient in the room, waiting times for anesthesia and surgery (p = 0.637) or to planning stability (scheduled, cancelled (p = 0.505), unscheduled and total operations performed (p = 0.984)). There were absolute changes, such as a reduction in the turnover time from 17:37 min to 16:26 min, even though not statistically significant (p = 0.238). Implementation of shop floor management as a single intervention is not appropriate to achieve a significant, continuous improvement in codes. A combination with other techniques such as detailed process analyses is definitely required. This could be important additional information for units using Lean Health Care strategies.
随着医疗保健经济压力的增加,现代医院管理正专注于工业优化技术,以提高效率,同时保持质量。现场管理是一种基于代码的、面向流程的现场直接指导技术,是一种旨在提高手术室效率的精益管理方法。在文献中,只有很少的证据表明仅引入这种技术就能提高效率。本回顾性研究的目的是确定仅使用一种工具是否能显著提高效率。我们对两个比较时期(现场管理引入时和一年后)的 3800 例手术中的多个代码进行了实证、回顾性分析。数据从医院信息系统中提取并转移到数据库中。选择的相关代码(手术室的周转率、第一位患者进入手术室的时间、麻醉和手术的等待时间(p=0.637)或计划稳定性(计划、取消(p=0.505)、非计划和总手术量(p=0.984))没有统计学上的显著变化。尽管没有统计学意义(p=0.238),但仍有绝对变化,如周转率从 17:37 分钟减少到 16:26 分钟。作为单一干预措施,实施现场管理并不适合实现代码的显著持续改进。需要与其他技术(如详细的流程分析)相结合。这对于使用精益医疗保健策略的单位来说可能是重要的补充信息。