Biomedical Engineering Department, Technical University of Delft, Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD, Delft, the Netherlands.
Science Education and Communication Department, Technical University of Delft, Mekelweg 5, 2628 CD, Delft, the Netherlands.
J Med Syst. 2023 Feb 4;47(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01912-9.
Literature proposes numerous initiatives for optimization of the Operating Room (OR). Despite multiple suggested strategies for the optimization of workflow on the OR, its patients and (medical) staff, no uniform description of 'optimization' has been adopted. This makes it difficult to evaluate the proposed optimization strategies. In particular, the metrics used to quantify OR performance are diverse so that assessing the impact of suggested approaches is complex or even impossible. To secure a higher implementation success rate of optimisation strategies in practice we believe OR optimisation and its quantification should be further investigated. We aim to provide an inventory of the metrics and methods used to optimise the OR by the means of a structured literature study. We observe that several aspects of OR performance are unaddressed in literature, and no studies account for possible interactions between metrics of quality and efficiency. We conclude that a systems approach is needed to align metrics across different elements of OR performance, and that the wellbeing of healthcare professionals is underrepresented in current optimisation approaches.
文献提出了许多优化手术室(OR)的举措。尽管有许多关于优化 OR 中工作流程的建议策略,但其患者和(医疗)工作人员,没有采用统一的“优化”描述。这使得评估所提出的优化策略变得困难。特别是,用于量化手术室绩效的指标多种多样,因此评估所建议方法的影响既复杂甚至是不可能的。为了在实践中提高优化策略的实施成功率,我们认为应该进一步研究手术室优化及其量化。我们的目的是通过一项结构化的文献研究,提供手术室优化所使用的指标和方法的清单。我们观察到文献中未涉及手术室绩效的几个方面,也没有研究考虑质量和效率指标之间的可能相互作用。我们得出结论,需要采用系统方法来调整手术室绩效不同要素的指标,并且当前的优化方法没有充分考虑医疗保健专业人员的健康状况。