• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦医疗服务的营销:误导性广告的概念

Marketing of healthcare services in Denmark: the concept of misleading advertising.

作者信息

Aagaard Lise

机构信息

National Committee on Health Research Ethics, Ørestads Boulevard 5, 2300, Copenhagen K, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Dec;42(6):1524-1527. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01111-3. Epub 2020 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11096-020-01111-3
PMID:32789762
Abstract

As severe ill and incurable patients can be easy victims of misleading advertising activities for dangerous and non-effective healthcare treatments, the marketing of healthcare services are in many jurisdictions legislations tightly regulated. This article reviews the Danish regulation on marketing of healthcare services to identify which types of advertising activities that are legal. As the legislation only allows healthcare authorities to control the marketing and not the content and quality of the marketed healthcare services, their ability to intervene in serious cases of misleading advertising is limited. Misleading advertising are statements with the purpose to exaggerate or underestimate the effects and risks of healthcare services or to prevent patients from seeking conventional medical treatments. From a public health perspective, there is a need for a common EU legislation for regulation of the marketing of healthcare services as the increasing use of information technologies makes it possible for the providers to access consumers and patients directly across countries and legal systems.

摘要

由于重症和绝症患者很容易成为危险且无效的医疗保健治疗误导性广告活动的受害者,因此在许多司法管辖区,医疗保健服务的营销受到严格的立法监管。本文回顾了丹麦对医疗保健服务营销的监管规定,以确定哪些类型的广告活动是合法的。由于该立法仅允许医疗保健当局控制营销,而不控制所营销的医疗保健服务的内容和质量,因此它们在严重误导性广告案件中的干预能力有限。误导性广告是指旨在夸大或低估医疗保健服务的效果和风险,或阻止患者寻求传统医疗治疗的陈述。从公共卫生的角度来看,由于信息技术的日益使用使得供应商能够直接跨越国家和法律体系接触消费者和患者,因此需要一项统一的欧盟立法来规范医疗保健服务的营销。

相似文献

1
Marketing of healthcare services in Denmark: the concept of misleading advertising.丹麦医疗服务的营销:误导性广告的概念
Int J Clin Pharm. 2020 Dec;42(6):1524-1527. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01111-3. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
2
Medical Marketing in the United States, 1997-2016.美国的医疗营销,1997-2016 年。
JAMA. 2019 Jan 1;321(1):80-96. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19320.
3
Is multi-level marketing of nutrition supplements a legal and an ethical practice?营养补充剂的多层次营销是否合法且符合道德规范?
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2018 Jun;25:133-138. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.03.118. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
4
Rogue stem cell clinics.非法干细胞诊所。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Feb;102-B(2):148-154. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-1104.R1.
5
Is the FDA regulating the practice of medicine?美国食品药品监督管理局在规范医疗行为吗?
Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Mar;33(3):452-5. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13476879.
6
Pharmaceutical companies and their drugs on social media: a content analysis of drug information on popular social media sites.制药公司及其药品在社交媒体上的情况:对热门社交媒体网站上药品信息的内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 1;17(6):e130. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4357.
7
What do Australian health consumers believe about commercial advertisements and testimonials? a survey on health service advertising.澳大利亚健康消费者对商业广告和推荐有何看法?一项关于卫生服务广告的调查。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10078-9.
8
Direct-to-Consumer Advertising for Cancer Centers and Institutes: Ethical Dilemmas and Practical Implications.直接面向消费者的癌症中心和研究所广告:伦理困境和实际影响。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2020 Mar;40:1-11. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_279963.
9
Restrictions on the conduct of advertising of medicinal products in Poland and their violations.波兰药品广告行为的限制及其违规情况。
Acta Pol Pharm. 2013 Jul-Aug;70(4):769-76.
10
[The advertising of medicinal products to the public in Poland--legislative, ethical, health and social concerns].[波兰向公众宣传药品——立法、伦理、健康及社会问题]
Przegl Epidemiol. 2004;58(3):555-63.