• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高低起伏:遗传易感性与日常事件

Highs and lows: Genetic susceptibility to daily events.

机构信息

Department of Genetic Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237001. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0237001
PMID:32790782
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7425846/
Abstract

Why people differ in their susceptibility to external events is essential to our understanding of personality, human development, and mental disorders. Genes explain a substantial portion of these differences. Specifically, genes influencing the serotonin system are hypothesized to be differential susceptibility factors, determining a person's reactivity to both positive and negative environments. We tested whether genetic variation in the serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) is a differential susceptibility factor for daily events. Participants (N = 326, 77% female, mean age = 25, range = 17-36) completed smartphone questionnaires four times a day over four to five days, measuring stressors, uplifts, positive and negative affect. Affect was predicted from environment valence in the previous hour on a within-person level using three-level autoregressive linear mixed models. The 5-HTTLPR fulfilled all criteria of a differential susceptibility factor: Positive affect in carriers of the short allele (S) was less reactive to both uplifts and stressors, compared to homozygous carriers of the long allele (L/L). This pattern might reflect relative affective inflexibility in S-allele carriers. Our study provides insight into the serotonin system's general role in susceptibility and highlights the need to assess the whole spectrum of naturalistic experiences.

摘要

为什么人们对外界事件的易感性存在差异,这对于我们理解个性、人类发展和精神障碍至关重要。基因解释了这些差异的很大一部分。具体来说,假设影响血清素系统的基因是差异易感性因素,决定了一个人对积极和消极环境的反应。我们测试了血清素转运体(5-HTTLPR)的基因变异是否是对日常事件的差异易感性因素。参与者(N=326,77%为女性,平均年龄为 25 岁,范围为 17-36 岁)在四天到五天内每天四次通过智能手机完成问卷调查,测量压力源、振奋事件、积极和消极情绪。使用三层自回归线性混合模型,在个体水平上,根据前一个小时的环境效价预测情绪。5-HTTLPR 满足差异易感性因素的所有标准:与长等位基因(L/L)纯合子携带者相比,短等位基因(S)携带者的积极情绪对振奋事件和压力源的反应性较低。这种模式可能反映了 S 等位基因携带者相对的情感灵活性不足。我们的研究提供了对血清素系统在易感性中普遍作用的深入了解,并强调了评估自然体验全貌的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d6/7425846/7725d579d248/pone.0237001.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d6/7425846/62c9fd7feff9/pone.0237001.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d6/7425846/7725d579d248/pone.0237001.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d6/7425846/62c9fd7feff9/pone.0237001.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08d6/7425846/7725d579d248/pone.0237001.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Highs and lows: Genetic susceptibility to daily events.高低起伏:遗传易感性与日常事件
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237001. eCollection 2020.
2
Serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) promoter polymorphisms and the susceptibility to posttraumatic stress disorder in the general population.血清素转运体基因(SLC6A4)启动子多态性与普通人群创伤后应激障碍易感性
Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;166(8):926-33. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08101542. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
3
Effects of Recent Stress and Variation in the Serotonin Transporter Polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) on Depressive Symptoms: A Repeated-Measures Study of Adults Age 50 and Older.近期压力及血清素转运体基因多态性(5-HTTLPR)变异对抑郁症状的影响:一项针对50岁及以上成年人的重复测量研究。
Behav Genet. 2016 Jan;46(1):72-88. doi: 10.1007/s10519-015-9740-8. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
4
Serotonin transporter gene polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and anxiety reactivity in daily life: a daily process approach to gene-environment interaction.血清素转运体基因多态性(5-HTTLPR)与日常生活中的焦虑反应性:基因-环境相互作用的日常过程研究方法
Psychosom Med. 2007 Nov;69(8):762-8. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318157ad42. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
5
5-HTTLPR moderates effects of current life events on neuroticism: differential susceptibility to environmental influences.5-HTTLPR 调节当前生活事件对神经质的影响:对环境影响的敏感性差异。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Aug 16;34(6):1070-4. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.05.028. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
6
Depression, Stressful Life Events, and the Impact of Variation in the Serotonin Transporter: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health).抑郁症、应激性生活事件以及血清素转运体变异的影响:青少年到成人健康的全国纵向研究(Add Health)的结果
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 3;11(3):e0148373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148373. eCollection 2016.
7
Differential effect of the 5-HTT gene-linked polymorphic region on emotional eating during stress exposure following tryptophan challenge.色氨酸挑战后应激暴露期间 5-HTT 基因连锁多态区对情绪性进食的差异影响。
J Nutr Biochem. 2012 Apr;23(4):410-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Jun 11.
8
Serotonin transporter gene variants and prediction of stress-induced risk for psychological distress.5-羟色胺转运体基因变异与应激诱导心理困扰风险的预测。
Genes Brain Behav. 2011 Jul;10(5):536-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2011.00690.x. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
9
Resting State Networks Mediate the Effect of Genotype by Environment Interaction on Mental Health.静息态网络介导基因型-环境交互作用对心理健康的影响。
Neuroscience. 2018 Jan 15;369:139-151. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
10
Differential effects of tri-allelic 5-HTTLPR polymorphisms in healthy subjects on mood and stress performance after tryptophan challenge.三等位体 5-HTTLPR 多态性对色氨酸挑战后健康受试者情绪和应激表现的差异影响。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Dec;34(13):2667-74. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.92. Epub 2009 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Affective neural signatures do not distinguish women with emotion dysregulation from healthy controls: A mega-analysis across three task-based fMRI studies.情感神经特征无法区分情绪调节障碍女性与健康对照者:基于三项任务态功能磁共振成像研究的元分析
Neuroimage Rep. 2021 May 29;1(2):100019. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2021.100019. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Genetic Differences in Reactivity to the Environment Impact Psychotic-Like and Affective Reactivity in Daily Life.对环境反应的基因差异影响日常生活中的类精神病性反应和情感反应。
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Mar 4;51(Suppl 2):S74-S84. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad162.
3
A volitional account of aesthetic experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Complex affect dynamics add limited information to the prediction of psychological well-being.复杂的情感动态对预测心理健康的作用有限。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 May;3(5):478-491. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0555-0. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
2
No Support for Historical Candidate Gene or Candidate Gene-by-Interaction Hypotheses for Major Depression Across Multiple Large Samples.没有证据支持大样本中主要抑郁症的历史候选基因或候选基因-交互作用假说。
Am J Psychiatry. 2019 May 1;176(5):376-387. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18070881. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
3
Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation.
审美体验的意志性阐释
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 24;15:1480304. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1480304. eCollection 2024.
4
Uplifts and hassles are related to worsening in chronic fatigue syndrome: a prospective study.振奋和烦恼与慢性疲劳综合征的恶化有关:一项前瞻性研究。
J Transl Med. 2023 Aug 20;21(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04412-z.
5
A Re-evaluation of Candidate Gene Studies for Well-Being in Light of Genome-Wide Evidence.基于全基因组证据对幸福相关候选基因研究的重新评估。
J Happiness Stud. 2022;23(6):3031-3053. doi: 10.1007/s10902-022-00538-x. Epub 2022 May 17.
6
Novel GxE effects and resilience: A case:control longitudinal study of psychosocial stress with war-affected youth.新型基因-环境交互作用与韧性:以受战争影响的青年为对象的心理社会应激的病例对照纵向研究
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 4;17(4):e0266509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266509. eCollection 2022.
7
Stress research during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.新冠疫情期间及之后的压力研究。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Dec;131:581-596. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.045. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
8
Oxytocin and the stress buffering effect of social company: a genetic study in daily life.催产素与社会交往的应激缓冲效应:日常生活中的一项遗传研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 May 19;15(3):293-301. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa034.
两层模型中的统计功效:基于蒙特卡罗模拟的教程。
Psychol Methods. 2019 Feb;24(1):1-19. doi: 10.1037/met0000195. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
4
Gene-environment interactions between stress and 5-HTTLPR in depression: A meta-analytic update.应激和 5-HTTLPR 基因-环境相互作用与抑郁症的关系:一项荟萃分析更新。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Jan 15;226:339-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.050. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
5
Variation in the serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and inertia of negative and positive emotions in daily life.5-羟色胺转运体基因多态性(5-HTTLPR)与日常生活中消极和积极情绪的惯性变化。
Emotion. 2018 Mar;18(2):229-236. doi: 10.1037/emo0000336. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
6
Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression.合作荟萃分析未发现压力与 5-HTTLPR 基因型之间存在强烈相互作用,从而导致抑郁发生的证据。
Mol Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;23(1):133-142. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.44. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
7
Statistical tests of differential susceptibility: Performance, limitations, and improvements.统计检验的差异易感性:表现、局限性和改进。
Dev Psychopathol. 2017 Oct;29(4):1267-1278. doi: 10.1017/S0954579416001292. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
8
Centering Predictor Variables in Three-Level Contextual Models.在三级情境模型中对预测变量进行中心化处理。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2017 Mar-Apr;52(2):149-163. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2016.1256753. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
9
Evidence of a prominent genetic basis for associations between psychoneurometric traits and common mental disorders.心理神经测量特征与常见精神障碍之间关联存在显著遗传基础的证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 May;115:4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
10
Daily emotional stress reactivity in emerging adulthood: temporal stability and its predictors.成年初期的日常情绪应激反应:时间稳定性及其预测因素。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2017 Mar;30(2):121-132. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2016.1228904. Epub 2016 Oct 1.