Suppr超能文献

DWJ1252与加斯莫汀治疗功能性消化不良的疗效和安全性比较:一项多中心、随机、双盲、活性对照研究。

Efficacy and Safety of DWJ1252 Compared With Gasmotin in the Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled Study.

作者信息

Park Jin Hwa, Lee Kang Nyeong, Lee Oh Young, Choi Myung-Gyu, Chung Hyunsoo, Choi Suck-Chei, Kim Nayoung, Park Hyojin, Sung In-Kyung, Sohn Chong Il, Jee Sam Ryong, Jang Jae Young, Rhee Poong-Lyul, Park Moo In, Kwon Joong Goo, Park Kyung Sik, Lee Kwang Jae, Lee Joon Seong

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Jan 30;27(1):87-96. doi: 10.5056/jnm20061.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Prokinetics such as mosapride citrate CR (conventional-release; Gasmotin) are commonly used in functional dyspepsia (FD). This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-a-day mosapride citrate SR (DWJ1252), a sustained-release formulation of mosapride citrate, compared with mosapride citrate CR 3 times a day, in patients with FD.

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study, 119 patients with FD (by the Rome III criteria, 60 for mosapride citrate SR and 59 for mosapride citrate CR) were randomly allocated to mosapride citrate SR once daily or mosapride citrate CR thrice daily for 4 weeks in 16 medical institutions. Primary end point was the change in gastrointestinal symptom (GIS) score from baseline, assessed by GIS questionnaires on 5-point Likert scale after 4-week treatment. Secondary end points and safety profiles were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The study included 51 and 49 subjects in the mosapride citrate SR and mosapride citrate CR groups, respectively. GIS scores at week 4 were significantly reduced in both groups (mean ± SD: -10.04 ± 4.45 and -10.86 ± 5.53 in the mosapride citrate SR and mosapride citrate CR groups, respectively; < 0.001), and the GIS changes from baseline did not differ between the 2 groups (difference, 0.82 point; 95% CI, -1.17, 2.81; = 0.643). Changes in GIS at weeks 2 and 4 and quality of life at week 4, and the improvement rates of global assessments at weeks 2 and 4, did not differ between the groups. Adverse events were similar in the 2 groups, and there were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

In patients with FD, mosapride citrate SR once daily is as effective as mosapride citrate CR thrice daily, with a similar safety profile.

摘要

背景/目的:促动力药如枸橼酸莫沙必利普通片(加斯清)常用于功能性消化不良(FD)。本研究旨在评估与每日3次服用枸橼酸莫沙必利普通片相比,每日1次服用枸橼酸莫沙必利缓释片(DWJ1252)治疗FD患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

在这项多中心、随机、双盲、活性对照、非劣效性研究中,119例FD患者(根据罗马Ⅲ标准,60例服用枸橼酸莫沙必利缓释片,59例服用枸橼酸莫沙必利普通片)在16家医疗机构中被随机分配至每日1次服用枸橼酸莫沙必利缓释片或每日3次服用枸橼酸莫沙必利普通片,疗程4周。主要终点为治疗4周后通过5级李克特量表胃肠道症状(GIS)问卷评估的胃肠道症状评分较基线的变化。还分析了次要终点和安全性。

结果

枸橼酸莫沙必利缓释片组和枸橼酸莫沙必利普通片组分别纳入51例和49例受试者。两组第4周时GIS评分均显著降低(枸橼酸莫沙必利缓释片组和枸橼酸莫沙必利普通片组分别为均值±标准差:-10.04±4.45和-10.86±5.53;P<0.001),且两组从基线开始的GIS变化无差异(差值为0.82分;95%CI,-1.17,2.81;P=0.643)。两组在第2周和第4周时的GIS变化、第4周时的生活质量以及第2周和第4周时的总体评估改善率均无差异。两组不良事件相似,且无严重不良事件。

结论

在FD患者中,每日1次服用枸橼酸莫沙必利缓释片与每日3次服用枸橼酸莫沙必利普通片疗效相当,安全性相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b716/7786082/5ca5f32cbc8c/jnm-27-1-87-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验