Sorbi M, Tellegen B
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Soc Sci Med. 1988;26(3):351-8. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90400-5.
During a total of six months weekly measurements of coping with every-day life stresses were obtained from 29 migraine patients. Four issues were investigated: (1) the relation between daily stresses and the occurrence of migraine attacks; (2) the associations between ways of stress-coping and attack occurrence; (3) the effects on stress-coping of two behavior therapeutic methods, relaxation training and stress-coping training; (4) the clinical utility of pre-training measurement of stress-coping. the results yield evidence that both threat as a form of every-day stress and 'depressive reaction' as a way to cope with threat are significantly related to the occurrence of migraine attacks. In general the effects of training on stress-coping appeared to be rather small. Three coping strategies changed as a result of both regimens taken together: 'tackling the problem actively' increased, while 'avoidance' and (quite tenuous) 'depressive reaction' decreased. Although relaxation training contributed most to these outcomes, no significant between-group differences were found. Divergent baseline per-subject patterns of stress-coping suggest that individual differences must be acknowledged. A sensible clinical usage of stress-coping data in our view requires that inferences are based on individual rather than group outcomes. Also, one cannot afford to neglect the actual and often idiosyncratic context of stress-coping.
在总共六个月的时间里,对29名偏头痛患者进行了每周一次应对日常生活压力的测量。研究了四个问题:(1)日常压力与偏头痛发作之间的关系;(2)压力应对方式与发作发生之间的关联;(3)两种行为治疗方法,即放松训练和压力应对训练对应对压力的影响;(4)压力应对预训练测量的临床效用。结果表明,作为日常压力形式的威胁和作为应对威胁方式的“抑郁反应”都与偏头痛发作的发生显著相关。总体而言,训练对应对压力的影响似乎相当小。两种治疗方案共同作用导致三种应对策略发生了变化:“积极解决问题”增加,而“回避”和(相当微弱的)“抑郁反应”减少。虽然放松训练对这些结果的贡献最大,但未发现组间有显著差异。个体应对压力的基线模式各不相同,这表明必须承认个体差异。我们认为,在临床中合理使用应对压力的数据需要基于个体而非群体结果进行推断。此外,不能忽视应对压力的实际且往往独特的背景。