Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Care Centre, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Hand and Plastic Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Department of Trauma, Orthopedic, Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Medicine, German Armed Forces Central Hospital, Ruebenacher Straße 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Oct;140(10):1575-1583. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03576-3. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
The surgical treatment of ring avulsion injuries is still challenging. This study provides data concerning epidemiology and factors influencing finger survival rate. We wanted to answer the question whether microsurgical advancement and a high level of surgical expertise nowadays may improve the outcome.
Between 11/2007 and 06/2016 95 ring avulsions were treated (classified according to Kay). Complete documentation was available from 87 patients (25 female). The mean age was 34 (4-82) years. Intact perfusion (Kay I) was preoperatively seen in 20 fingers while 67 were avascular (Kay II-IV).
In 89%, the ring finger was injured during mainly private accidents. Primary amputation was performed in 38 Kay II-IV injuries. Revascularization was applied to 29 fingers while 8 of them (28%) primarily failed. After initially successful revascularization/replantation of 21 fingers, 6 had to be amputated secondarily (success rate: 52%). There was no significant correlation between affected finger and rate of finger preservation. Climbing over a fence as trauma mechanism significantly correlated with lower finger preservation rates and higher incidence of Kay IV injuries.
Despite microsurgical advances and high levels of surgical expertise the finger survival rate after ring avulsion injuries still seems to be mostly influenced by the extend of intrinsic damage.
环形撕脱伤的手术治疗仍然具有挑战性。本研究提供了有关流行病学和影响手指存活率因素的数据。我们想回答的问题是,当今的显微外科推进和高水平的手术技术是否可以改善结果。
2007 年 11 月至 2016 年 6 月期间,治疗了 95 例环形撕脱伤(根据 Kay 分类)。87 例患者(25 名女性)的完整记录可用。平均年龄为 34 岁(4-82 岁)。20 根手指术前存在完整灌注(Kay I),而 67 根手指无血运(Kay II-IV)。
89%的环形指损伤发生在主要私人事故中。38 例 Kay II-IV 损伤行一期截肢。对 29 根手指进行了血运重建,其中 8 根(28%)最初失败。在 21 根手指最初成功的血运重建/再植后,有 6 根需要二次截肢(成功率:52%)。受影响的手指与手指保存率之间没有显著相关性。作为创伤机制的爬过栅栏与较低的手指保存率和较高的 Kay IV 损伤发生率显著相关。
尽管显微外科技术有了进步,手术技术水平也很高,但环形撕脱伤后手指存活率似乎主要还是受内在损伤程度的影响。