Suppr超能文献

事后研究不端行为调查作为机构诚信度的衡量标准(DR)。

The research misconduct post hoc inquiry as a measure of institutional integrity (DR).

机构信息

Retired, Intramural Research at the US Office of Research Integrity , MD, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University , New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Account Res. 2021 Jan;28(1):54-57. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1801431. Epub 2020 Aug 14.

Abstract

The terms, institutional and scientific, integrity appeared in the literature 986 times from 2005 to 2015. How has the term integrity, with its dual definition, a) The accuracy, completeness and consistency of data and b) the adherence to a code of moral values, been applied to an institution? The authors suggest that a post hoc inquiry be instituted following the finding of an individual act of research misconduct to determine if the sponsoring institution, actively or passively, played a contributory role and if corrective action was taken. This would serve as one measure of institutional integrity.

摘要

2005 年至 2015 年期间,文献中出现了 986 次术语“制度和科学诚信”。这个术语诚信有双重定义,a)数据的准确性、完整性和一致性,b)遵守道德价值观准则,是如何应用于一个机构的?作者建议,在发现个人研究不端行为后进行事后调查,以确定赞助机构是否积极或被动地发挥了促成作用,如果采取了纠正措施。这将是机构诚信的一个衡量标准。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验