关于倡导作为全球卫生法基础的思考
Reflections on Advocacy as a Foundation of Global Health Law.
作者信息
Gonsalves Gregg
机构信息
Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States.
出版信息
J Law Med Ethics. 2025;53(S1):59. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.9. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
Abstract
Law can function and act on norms, through legislation, regulation, treaties and the like. Law can also be a key accompaniment to activism. The career of Larry Gostin represents both aspects of the law in achieving social change.
摘要
法律可以通过立法、监管、条约等方式发挥作用并作用于规范。法律也可以成为行动主义的关键辅助。拉里·戈斯汀的职业生涯体现了法律在实现社会变革方面的这两个方面。
相似文献
1
Reflections on Advocacy as a Foundation of Global Health Law.关于倡导作为全球卫生法基础的思考
J Law Med Ethics. 2025;53(S1):59. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.9. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
2
The ultimate power play in research - partnering with patients, partnering with power.研究中的终极权力博弈——与患者合作，与权力合作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00745-9.
3
Global Health Law: Between Hard and Soft Law.全球卫生法：介于硬法与软法之间
J Law Med Ethics. 2025;53(S1):11-15. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.21. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
4
Technology Effects and Child Health: Wellness Impact and Social Effects (TECHWISE): Protocol for a Prospective, Observational, Real-World Study.技术影响与儿童健康：健康影响和社会效应（TECHWISE）：一项前瞻性、观察性、真实世界研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 19;14:e69358. doi: 10.2196/69358.
5
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果：面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
6
Who Tweets for the autistic community? A natural language processing-driven investigation.谁为自闭症群体发声？一项基于自然语言处理的调查。
Autism. 2025 Jul;29(7):1740-1753. doi: 10.1177/13623613251325934. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
7
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”：成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Editor's view: Value of information in the 21st century - examples from science, medicine, policy, media, and markets.编辑观点：21世纪信息的价值——来自科学、医学、政策、媒体和市场的实例
J Glob Health. 2025 Jun 20;15:01003. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.01003.
9
Environmental Health: Towards Synthesis in Global Law and Governance.《环境卫生：迈向全球法律与治理的综合》
J Law Med Ethics. 2025;53(S1):41-45. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.10. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
10
The Changing Epidemiology of Type 1 Diabetes: A Global Perspective.1型糖尿病不断变化的流行病学：全球视角
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1111/dom.16501.
本文引用的文献
1
Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality.回顾：一项关于衡量撤稿声明质量的评分标准的试点研究。
Account Res. 2025 Aug;32(6):1015-1026. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2366281. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
2
Should research administrators be regulated as carefully as researchers?研究管理人员是否应该像研究人员一样受到严格监管？
Bioessays. 2024 Jun;46(6):e2300196. doi: 10.1002/bies.202300196. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
3
What do Retraction Notices Reveal About Institutional Investigations into Allegations Underlying Retractions?撤稿通知揭示了哪些与撤稿相关指控的机构调查有关的信息？
Sci Eng Ethics. 2023 Jul 4;29(4):25. doi: 10.1007/s11948-023-00442-4.
4
The argument for adopting a jurisprudence platform for scientific misconduct.关于采用法理学平台处理科研不端行为的论点。
Account Res. 2024 Oct;31(7):814-825. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2172678. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
5
Research integrity guidelines and safeguards in Brazil.巴西的研究诚信准则和保障措施。
Account Res. 2023 Apr;30(3):133-149. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1979969. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
6
What criteria are used in the investigation of alleged cases of research misconduct?在对涉嫌科研不端行为的调查中使用了哪些标准？
Account Res. 2023 Feb;30(2):109-131. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1973894. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
7
A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases.一项以研究伦理和研究诚信案例为特色的文献综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Apr 30;22(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00620-8.
8
Cooperation & Liaison between Universities & Editors (CLUE): recommendations on best practice.大学与编辑之间的合作与联络（CLUE）：最佳实践建议
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021 Apr 15;6(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-021-00109-3.
9
The research misconduct post hoc inquiry as a measure of institutional integrity (DR).事后研究不端行为调查作为机构诚信度的衡量标准（DR）。
Account Res. 2021 Jan;28(1):54-57. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1801431. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
10
Transatlantic editorial: Institutional investigations of ethically flawed reports in cardiothoracic surgery journals.跨大西洋社论：心胸外科期刊中存在伦理缺陷报告的机构调查
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Apr 1;57(4):617-619. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz366.
Zotero 插件