Department of Medicine.
Department of Radiology.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2020 Dec;19(4):e151-e156. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
Colitis-associated cancers (CAC) are a catastrophic complication of inflammatory bowel disease; at diagnosis, CAC is frequently at an advanced stage. Although the genomic alterations (GA) in CAC are different from sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC), the same systemic therapies are used. We compared clinically relevant outcomes using standard care systemic chemotherapy of stage IV CAC versus a matched patient control cohort of stage IV CRC patients.
A retrospective matched cohort design was used. Eighteen cases of stage IV CAC (7 ulcerative colitis, 11 Crohn disease) and 18 CRC were identified. GA analysis was available for all patients. Outcome endpoints included response rate and response duration, progression-free survival, and OS.
Although the response rates were similar (CAC 35.7% vs. CRC 57.1%, P = .45), the median duration of response for CAC was significantly shorter (1.4 months, vs. CRC 11.8 months, P = .006). There was no difference in dose density of first-line therapy between cohorts, suggesting that shorter response duration was due to more rapid development of chemotherapy resistance. Median OS was significantly shorter for CAC patients (13 vs. 27.6 months, P = .034). As expected, there was a difference in the spectrum of GA between CAC and CRC cohorts. However, GA associated with poor prognosis (eg, B-Raf) were no more frequent in the CAC cohort.
Clinically meaningful outcomes of duration of response and OS are worse for CAC versus sporadic CRC patients treated with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first therapy for metastatic disease.
结肠炎相关性癌症(CAC)是炎症性肠病的灾难性并发症;在诊断时,CAC 通常处于晚期。尽管 CAC 的基因组改变(GA)与散发性结直肠癌(CRC)不同,但仍使用相同的系统治疗方法。我们比较了使用标准护理系统化疗治疗 IV 期 CAC 与 IV 期 CRC 患者匹配的患者对照队列的临床相关结局。
使用回顾性匹配队列设计。确定了 18 例 IV 期 CAC(7 例溃疡性结肠炎,11 例克罗恩病)和 18 例 CRC。对所有患者进行 GA 分析。结局终点包括缓解率和缓解持续时间、无进展生存期和 OS。
尽管缓解率相似(CAC 为 35.7%,CRC 为 57.1%,P=.45),但 CAC 的中位缓解持续时间明显更短(1.4 个月,CRC 为 11.8 个月,P=.006)。两个队列之间的一线治疗剂量密度没有差异,这表明缓解持续时间较短是由于化疗耐药性更快发展。CAC 患者的中位 OS 明显更短(13 个月 vs. 27.6 个月,P=.034)。正如预期的那样,CAC 和 CRC 队列之间的 GA 谱存在差异。然而,与 CAC 队列预后不良相关的 GA(例如 B-Raf)并不更频繁。
与接受 FOLFOX 或 FOLFIRI 作为转移性疾病一线治疗的散发性 CRC 患者相比,CAC 患者在缓解持续时间和 OS 方面的临床结局更差。