Long-term Outcomes of Full Pulpotomy in Permanent Molars for Patients Treated in a Single, Short Session under Special Conditions.

INTRODUCTION

Endodontic procedures for patients requiring treatment in a single, short session need to be validated. This study aimed at evaluating the long-term outcome of full pulpotomy in permanent molars performed with reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol cement (Intermediate Restorative Material [IRM], Dentsply Sirona, Versailles, France) immediately restored using stainless steel crowns under general anesthesia.

METHODS

The absence of clinical signs and symptoms and the evolution of the periapical index between the treatment date and the longest follow-up time were used to grade the pulpotomy outcome as "effective," "uncertain," or "ineffective." The impact of different criteria on the pulpotomy outcome was tested (ie, the etiology of the lesion, tooth maturity, endodontic difficulty related to the coronal shape and the root canal shape, and endodontic difficulty related to the radiographic root canal appearance).

RESULTS

Among the 608 teeth (338 patients) treated in a single session with IRM full pulpotomy and stainless steel preformed crowns, 263 (143 patients) were evaluated after a median follow-up period of 24 months. Overall, 89% of the pulpotomies were effective, 7.6% were of uncertain outcome, and 3.4% were ineffective. No tested criteria influenced the rate of effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcomes of IRM pulpotomy are similar to those of calcium silicate-based cement pulpotomy observed in the literature. This procedure should not be restricted to patients treated under general anesthesia because it is relevant for all special conditions that impose the provision of endodontic treatment in a single, short session, such as dental care emergencies during humanitarian crises or pandemic periods.