Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Urology, Cliniques universitaires st Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
J Endourol. 2021 Jan;35(1):84-90. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0254. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
Double-J ureteral stents are subject to encrustation. Studies have shown that the encrustation onset is linked with indwelling time. In prevention, it is admitted that the Double-J stent indwelt for medium or long term should be replaced periodically. However, in the absence of guidelines, indwelling durations vary with centers' habits, stent indication, and stent materials. Our target was to evaluate the actual ureteral stent medium-/long-term indwelling times and related encrustation rates perceived by urologists in daily practice. An observational retrospective study was performed over six European centers. All data of all consecutive removed stents of the same material implanted for more than 2 months within a same 2-year referred period were collected. Three stent types of various materials, with/without coating, were evaluated. Encrustation rates were analyzed according to indwelling times and stent indication. Four hundred seventy-three stents were recorded with indwelling times between 60 and 679 days. An unexpected number of long-term indwelling times were noticed: globally one-third more than 6 months, and 9% more than 1 year. In case of malignant indication, these rates were, respectively, 44% and 17%. For nonstone indication, clinically significant encrustation rates stayed extremely low before 4 months (1.3%) and quite low before 6 months (5.2%), increasing with time to reach around 10% in the long term. However, as expected, the rate was higher for stone indication with a marked increase after 4 months (8% before 4 months, nearly 17% after). Our data confirm a higher encrustation risk for stone patients. Long indwelling times in nonstone patients beyond 6 months or even 12 months appear to be still requested and relatively well supported in usual practice by this population.
双 J 输尿管支架易发生结石形成。研究表明,结石形成与留置时间有关。在预防方面,公认的是,对于中、长期留置的双 J 支架应定期更换。然而,由于缺乏指南,留置时间因中心习惯、支架适应证和支架材料而异。我们的目标是评估泌尿科医生在日常实践中观察到的输尿管支架中、长期实际留置时间及其相关结石形成率。
一项在六个欧洲中心进行的观察性回顾性研究。在同一 2 年参考期内,收集了同一材料植入超过 2 个月的所有连续取出的支架的所有数据。评估了三种不同材料的支架类型,有无涂层。根据留置时间和支架适应证分析结石形成率。
共记录了 473 根留置时间为 60 至 679 天的支架。注意到意外的长留置时间:全球三分之一超过 6 个月,9%超过 1 年。在恶性适应证的情况下,这些比例分别为 44%和 17%。对于非结石适应证,在 4 个月前(1.3%)和 6 个月前(5.2%)临床显著结石形成率非常低,随着时间的推移增加到长期的 10%左右。然而,正如预期的那样,结石患者的结石形成率较高,在 4 个月后(4 个月前 8%,之后近 17%)显著增加。
我们的数据证实了结石患者的结石形成风险更高。对于非结石患者,超过 6 个月甚至 12 个月的长留置时间似乎仍然需要,并且在该人群的常规实践中得到了较好的支持。